Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Update: November 1st 2010.

Update: November 1st 2010.

Bergsma of The Standard lied knowingly and I have challenged her in the open, publicly. VanSickle as City Editor was responsible for the lie and equally lied publicly. On October 26th 2010 top of page A6 is this caption.

“Mayor: Second place finisher says he’s appalled by votes for Beam, Davidoff and LeBlanc.”

As you read this page, a continuation of a Bergsma story from front page, you will see a quote by D’Intino on paragraph number 7, and I quote:

“Why would someone vote for Terry LeBlanc or John Beam, who registered at the last minute and who didn’t even want to be elected” he asked. “The fact that two of them together got almost 2000 votes is appalling to me.”

Mr. D’Intino does not mention my name. Bergsma and VanSickle lied again. WHY? It comes apparently easy for both.

Now listen to the voice of VanSickle the City Editor for The Standard. He called me on October 27th 2010 and I recorded him. VanSickle almost ready to cry in his voice. The hypocrite goes on that he wants to talk to me as “father to father.” According to him his kid brought my flyer to him where publicly I call Bergsma, VanSickle, Kriluck and Bullis liars. They are! Now he says that I slandered them yet no threat of lawyers. McMullan threatened me on October 22nd by phone that he referred this to his Toronto lawyers. Where are they McMullan? I am still waiting! Councillor Stevens threatened me with her “solicitors” in August. Where are they Stevens? I am still waiting! Neither McMullan nor Stevens can carry through with their threats as under no circumstances can they risk the public airing of their corrupt act in fixing a lawful by-law fine. I WELCOME IT McMULLAN! I WELCOME IT STEVENS!

Now VanSickle as the City Editor cries on the phone that he has been exposed as a liar! He says I slandered him. If I was wrong and you can prove it you would want to take action. VanSickle you know you lied and all you can now do is cry? You have impressed me I do say. VanSickle tries to make me say specifically what he lied about and in the end says, “We stand by what we print.” Thank you VanSickle legally I needed that. So you stand by October 26th and page A6? So you stand by the lie printed October 22nd page A3? So you stand by the lie printed October 14th page A3? By the way VanSickle your name appears on the top of each page mentioned! Any comment on that VanSickle, not “father to father” but man to man? I don’t think so. Listen to VanSickle’s voice and you can only be sickened. A liar caught now has to cry.

To you McMullan. Any Toronto lawyers yet? I am still waiting. On October 26th 2010 you are quoted as saying the “blog… isn’t true.” Do you stand by that McMullan? The voice of Stevens isn’t true? Mark Leeson only a liar? Is that what you are saying McMullan? When you called Mark Leeson at home, remember that McMullan, angry as hell. You told him not to record the conversation are you sure it wasn’t? You called Mark Leeson after 8:00 pm angry at why he gave the answering machine message by Stevens to anyone. Remember that? When you met with Mark Leeson at the local branch of the Legion in Merritton and said that the ticket was taken care of, do you remember that?

Now listen to a uniformed police officer from the NRP he was at my home on October 22nd 2010. He came to get background information on the Lindal harassment. This officer stayed for 35 minutes, 45 seconds and was recorded. What you have here is only a portion of our conversation relating directly to Stevens and her telephone answering machine message. Listen to a uniformed police officer as he explains how to handle a by-law fine if one believes it to be
unjust. Maybe McMullan you want to call this officer a liar too!

Neither Bergsma nor VanSickle or anyone from The Standard will walk away from the consequences of their intentional lies. Neither McMullan nor Stevens will walk away from the consequences of their corrupt act in fixing a lawful by-law fine.

Where are your lawyers McMullan? Where are your solicitors Stevens?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Update: Sunday October 24th 2010.

Update: Sunday October 24th 2010.

On Sunday October 24th 2010 approximately 1:50 pm two NRP officers came to my home. I recorded the whole conversation it lasted 8 min. 37 seconds. These two officers came with the intention to intimidate and harass only. They did not identify themselves. The whole transcript follows. You will see contradictions and comments made by the two officers that make no sense.
First officer says “You obviously know why we’re here.” How could I? They took no notes, no details for the record. My three children and wife were in the room as one stood with his hands on his hip and on his gun. It appears the reason why them came was because of a flyer dropped into the mailbox of Burch and Stevens. This flyer is also attached. One officer said that Stevens contacted “us today,” not that Stevens called the police but “us”. Yet the flyer was delivered by volunteers the day before. You will see statements made by the officer of what Stevens had said and my replies. The officers made false statements they did not ask questions, they did not write anything for the record as any officer has to do. An incident report has to be filed by these two mercenaries how would it be possible when not one word was written down by them, not one word written for the record. The officer who came on Friday October 22nd wrote pages of notes, asked for my name, date of birth even of my three children. He knew he was being recorded and stayed over 35 minutes.

These two came only to intimidate and harass. Nothing about them was official or proper. No incident report, at least a legitimate one, can be filed by them. They took no notes! They asked no real questions only made accusations based on lies by Stevens and Burch. They used the first names of both Stevens and Burch? Nothing was part of normal procedure. They made the claim that I served legal papers on Mrs. Pat Lindal. That was a lie and I said I was only one of two witnesses and that Mr. Preston Haskell had served the legal papers as the publisher of the newsletter WINNERS CIRCLE after Mrs. Pat Lindal threatened and harassed advertisers in the newsletter. Now Burch claims he was the only one who got this flyer on the whole street. Queenston Street is an extremely long street, had he gone to each house? A lie! My volunteers delivered the flyers not me and both Burch and Stevens lied!

I told these two officers, or mercenaries that they are being recorded. They make a noise, a sigh of shock. Then one says, “Now that I know I’m being recorded. I’m gonna cut it short…” They both panicked. They came as thugs and mercenaries with hands on their hips and guns in front of my children and wife. They came with one purpose and it was to intimidate and threaten on behalf of two Merritton Councillors who can not allow the truth to be public. Councillor Stevens knows she and McMullan committed a corrupt act and cannot allow this to be public. Councillor Burch has much to answer and cannot allow it to be public. Two uniformed officers of the Niagara Regional Police were used in an attempt to silence the truth. These two officers came in breach of the Charter of Rights and the guarantee that all Canadians have of freedom of speech and expression. These two officers of the NRP had committed criminal harassment on behalf of Councillor Burch and Councillor Stevens. Every effort will now be made to have charges of criminal harassment laid against both these NRP officers and Councillors Burch and Stevens. In addition the Niagara Regional Police Department and Councillors Burch and Stevens will face civil law suites.

We have all read about the horrors of what happened in Toronto with the G8 Summit and police thuggery. Here in St. Catharines two elected councillors have used officers in uniform of the NRP to silence the truth.



Chief Southall will have a letter explaining the whole situation and a copy of the recorded voices of her thugs delivered within days. Solicitors are being asked to prepare all necessary action against the NRP Department, Councillor Stevens and Councillor Burch.


Transcript of 2 NRP officers, October 24th 2010
Sent by Councillor Stevens and Councillor Burch
(to the residence of Alexander Davidoff, with wife and 3 children present)

A.D. - Hi.

Officer 1 - Mr. Davidoff.

A.D. - That’s me.

Officer 1 - How are you?

A.D. - Wonderful, come on in.

Officer 1 - Mind if we have a chat?

A.D. - No, not at all.

Officer 1 - O.K. good.

A.D. - Come on in, sit down.

Officer 2 - Everyone’s here.

A.D. - Yea, so we’ve just about to go out to do more of our work.

Officer 1 - Um, you obviously know why we’re here.

A.D. - No.

Officer 1 - O.K. we’re here because Jennie Stevens contacted us today.

A.D. - Oh, yea.

Officer 1 - O.K., in regards to I guess that some issues you’ve guys have had before in the past.

A.D. - I have no idea what issues so you’re gonna have to tell me.

Officer 1 - O.K. She has explained to us that here this has been an ongoing thing between you and her I guess.

A.D. - What is? O.D. - (A.D’s wife): What is ongoing?

Officer 1 - Apparently there’s documents served under her mother.

A.D. - Got nothing to do with me.

Officer 1 - The fact that you were there.

A.D. - I was brought in only as a witness because there was three of us as witnesses. So it has nothing to do with me whatsoever. It’s Preston Haskell, the publisher of a newsletter, nothing to do with me.

Officer 1 - The way that she’s explained.

A.D. - She’s lied.

Officer 1 - We’re not going to take any sides, because she’s contacted us and we are just explaining.

A.D. - She’s said to you that I’ve had something to do with the documents?

Officer 1 - No, she said that the documents served under her mother, you were there.

A.D. - Oh, that was because Preston Haskell asked for several witnesses, there was another individual there as well.

Officer 1 - There was three people there.

A.D. - Correct.

Officer 1 - O.K., so she feels that because you were there and you were directly involved with the complaint.

A.D. - I had no complaint against her. I’ve never made a complaint against her.

Officer 1 - Oh, so there ‘s no complaints, no complaints that are with you against her. O.K., she, what she has explained to us is that there’s this ah, this publication ah, called the Winners, Niagara Winners Circle. Something like that.

A.D. - Winners Circle yea, I can even give you a copy if you want.

Officer 1 - She showed me a copy.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - and I guess, I don’t know a lot about the document, I don’t know what it’s about, um its issues that ah the local residents have about the city and the ah…

A.D. - it’s a newsletter published by a retired…please if you wish make yourself comfortable!

Officer 1 - No, we sit, we sit all day so.

A.D. - O.K., ah it’s a newsletter. Preston Haskell, I don’t know if you’ve heard of him, he was in the mayoral race, he’s a local political, I don’t know what you call, activist, spokesperson. Ah, he’s also one of the premier photographers and his son runs a photography studio. Now, he and a group of retired businessmen have the group called Winners Circle and they publish that newsletter and they get volunteers, anybody who wants to deliver to help them deliver it because they, um, the cost of having it delivered with newspapers is astronomical. That’s, that’s the Winners Circle to give you the background of the Winners Circle.

Officer 1 - O.K., so what she’s explaining to us is that I guess there was something put in there about the way that she’s been running a ward. Ah, there was something actually from you apparently in there.

A.D. - Ah, there is nothing in there from me. And if you’ve looked at it you would have seen there is nothing in there by me. I don’t write for them.

Officer 1 - I wasn’t gonna look at it.

A.D. - But just to let you know, I don’t write for them I don’t do anything. You can confirm everything with Mr. Haskell. I can even give you his phone number if you wish. Ah, Winners Circle has nothing to do with me nor I with them.

Officer 1 - O.K. then why were you there serving a document on her mother?

A.D. - I was not serving it, I was there as a witness. I was not serving anything.

Officer 1 - So what, what connection do you have with the Winners Circle?

A.D. - I know Preston! Mr. Haskell, Preston Haskell, whichever way you want it, right, and I’ve known Preston for a long time, oh, I’m explaining it to you , oh heavens no problem! I’ve known Preston for quite a while ah, we’ve worked on issues such as environmental, um, I was involved in a massive environmental issue here through the Environmental Commissioner, Ministry of Environment, it was huge right, and he wrote about it, in the newsletter, and actually so did both the newspapers um, I’ve known Preston for a long while.

Officer 1 - O.K., um I guess another issue that they were concerned about was, ah, Jeff Burch.

A.D. - aha?

Officer 1 - I guess was concerned that ah because of these issues that Jennie’s been having or she’s thinks she’s been having these issues with you - ah, he received a pamphlet in the mail ah, it was three documents, and one was.

A.D. - It was a flyer?

Officer 1 - Yea, one was a flyer with your information. Another was a um, a flyer with another councillor’s information another one was a, a, issues with the two councillors, the two ah, Merritton ward councillors, um, he was concerned because he was the only one that got that on the whole street he asked…

A.D. - Well, that’s up to the volunteer number one, she, the volunteer ran out of flyers so that was when she delivered three hundred and eighty I think that day.

Officer 1 - O.K.

A.D. - So that’s up to uh Sharon, she ran out so she’s out there trying to do more.

Officer 1 - We’ll say that it’s total coincidence. For some reason they’re concerned for their safety, they’re intimidated by you, O.K. I am just telling you what they told me.

A.D. - O.K., please do.

Officer 1 - They’re intimidated by you, ah.

A.D. - In what way?

Officer 1 - They feel that, ah, well apparently somebody was at her door this morning at five o’clock.

A.D. - Shore as hell wasn’t me. So she can lie all she wants to.

Officer 1 - She didn’t say it was you, she’s concerned it might have been you though because you’ve got something going on with her so, ah…

A.D. - Just to let you know all of its being recorded and continue.

Officer 1 - O.K. (sigh)

A.D. - This is an insanity. But you know, just to let you know, just before she, do you know I am a candidate in the election?

Officer 1 - Yeah.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - She mentioned that, yea.

A.D. - And when as a candidate in any election, if you raise a question regarding another candidate right, how can that individual then carry on with being concerned? This sounds like that moron D’Intino.

Officer 1 - I’m gonna… that I know I’m being recorded I’m gonna cut it short and I’m gonna tell you that she doesn’t want you on her property.

A.D. - I don’t intend to and never have been. I have been once when I was delivering the newsletter.

Officer 1 - She doesn’t want you on her property, Jeff doesn’t want you on his property. O.K.

A.D. - I haven’t been on his property.

Officer 1 - She’s concerned for her safety, and that was addressed to us. So you’ve been told not to go on her property.

A.D. - I guarantee you.

Officer 2 - Or any of your representatives or assistants….

A.D. - Well it’s all been done with, the election finishes tomorrow.

Officer 1 - Just so that you know O.K., and that’s the reason why we’re here.

A.D. - Aha.

Officer 1 - O.K., any questions?

A.D. - Oh god no! Um, Jennie Stevens has claimed, and Burch, that they’re intimidated by me, is that right?

Officer 1 - Right.

A.D. - O.K., and just so that you know for yourselves when we had the Merritton, ah, hall meeting, I forgot the date, all the candidates right, and we made it clear because a lot of residents here have been asking the question of Burch. He’s refused to talk to anyone, it has to do with the environmental issue here. So the flyer that’s out there simply asking the question why do you ignore your Merritton residents, I’m happy to even give you one if you wish. The question to Jennie is again a Merritton residents’ question asking her to explain why are you ignoring, not me, but dozens of residents, right. Ah, once in the summer when the kids and I, we were volunteers and we delivered the newsletter around, she didn’t want the newsletter and I have her recorded and she said to me she doesn’t want me on her property and I told her point blank never again. Ah, volunteers as you might know, they go do a street. They don’t know who lives where, right, they just simply volunteer to deliver a flyer because of the election, so for this woman to claim this I am very happy she has and ah, she’s nuts.

Officer 1 - This has nothing to do with us.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - we’re done here.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - O.K.

A.D. - Thank you.

Officer 1 - Thank you for that.

A.D. - Thank you very much.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Update: October 22 at 3:35 pm.

Update: October 22 at 3:35 pm.

Today October 22 at 3:35pm Mayor McMullan called me on my cell phone with a blocked ID. His secretary spoke and asked if I would take a call from the mayor. McMullan like any hypocrite first wished me “well” for Monday. Then he said “your blog you call me corrupt I have referred this to my solicitors in Toronto” my reply was “wonderful” and I hung up.

McMullan You Have Threatened me with your Toronto solicitors carry it through!

Now publicly I tell you McMullan I would want nothing more than to dance with you in a public forum such as a court! Corruption is not dollar valued! Whether it is ‘one million’ or ‘126’ or even only ‘1 dollar’, a corrupt act is simply a corrupt act. My blog has been available since May 2010 you have been successful with the Standard to censor the truth. Now Bergsma and Mr. Peter Downs have both lied and printed lies to protect you.

On this blog is the voice of Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens, the telephone answering machine message she left, you can listen to her or read the transcript. I have never said City Hall is corrupt. You lie if you claim that. The Standard reporters Bergsma and Downs are liars! I have said that Mayor Brian McMullan is corrupt and committed a corrupt act! I have said Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens is corrupt and committed a corrupt act! You McMullan won’t face me not at Brock University or anywhere else. You McMullan make telephone threats of Toronto solicitors. I have the voice of Councillor Stevens after I and my children delivered the summer edition of the newsletter Winners Circle. Stevens came running and threatened me “you will hear from my solicitor.” (Aug. 24th 2010). Do you want to hear her voice? I have it recorded! That was months ago. Now you threaten me!

I ask you McMullan if you want to hear another voice I recorded today October 22nd 2010. This is a uniformed police officer of the NIAGARA REGIONAL POLICE. He came to my home at approximately 11:00 am and stayed for 35 minutes, 17 seconds. He was sent to get background information on the Pat Lindal letters of threat and harassment. (You know Councillor Stevens’ mother!) I recorded the whole session with the officer. I won’t use his voice here but this is of great importance. These words are of the NRP officer and again I say that I have him recorded! When he, the officer, asks what set Lindal off I explain the blog and the voice message of Councillor Stevens. This uniformed police officer then says, “There is only one way to deal with a by-law fine if you disagree with it, you go to court.” He goes on to explain how a judge makes the final decision at the Provincial Offences Court. This is the voice of an NRP uniformed police officer McMullan! You and Stevens fixed a lawful by-law fine. You McMullan and Stevens breached the Municipal Act, the Charter of Rights and perjured your Oath of Office. You McMullan and Councillor Stevens committed a corrupt act. Only you McMullan and Councillor Stevens have I called corrupt, no one else!

You McMullan made the public statement that these allegations are groundless! You McMullan and the Standard have censored the truth from the public of St.Catharines. You McMullan and the Standard have in fact fixed an election so the public don’t get to hear all the information. Bergsma and Downs of the Standard have lied and published the lie. The Standard has with full intent kept the truth from the people of St.Catharines and had a reason to do so. The truth would destroy you McMullan and you can’t have that. Why did you not let the people of St. Catharines listen or read the transcript of Councillor Stevens’ voice? I know the reason and so do you McMullan!

You McMullan now threaten me with Toronto lawyers over the phone in a cowardly fashion. I tell you, get those Toronto lawyers and you and I will go into the public arena of a court. Everyone can listen to Councillor Stevens’ voice and let the judge decide! I will publish on the blog your Toronto lawyer’s letter and if no one comes I will update the blog every few days. I have wanted this public from the beginning and now eagerly await your Toronto lawyers!

Finally to Mr. Peter Downs of the Standard. You lied! Once again the Standard lies. Most of what you wrote was darn good and correct, rather unusual for a Standard reporter. But you lied Mr. Downs in paragraph number 8. You lied without checking the facts and had that lie printed. I quote you:

Davidoff has maintained that city hall is corrupt because a Merritton neighbour’s fine for failing to shovel a snowy walk was reversed when the neighbour was able to offer a satisfactory explanation to city staff and promised to shovel his sidewalk in the future.

You lied Mr. Downs and I have a statement by that individual who had the fine fixed by McMullan and Stevens. Bergsma lied and now so have you. Did you bother to look at the blog or listen to the voice of Stevens? Somehow I think not. You only copied Bergsma right? But you did make one subtle change didn’t you? Notice it? Look at Bergsma’s lie of October 14th and now look at yours! You Mr. Downs lied. Why???

Mr. Downs I am not D’Intino. I don’t contradict myself when I talk to someone nor do I claim international hackers or conspiracies. You sir didn’t talk to me at Brock did you? You know you didn’t and yet you wrote that lie. You know I have witnesses at the Brock Forum so why write and print a lie? You had to know it was a lie. WHY LIE???

Finally McMullan out-sourcing again. Could you not find local lawyers to threaten me with or have too many local lawyers seen and heard the blog?

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Update: You are a liar Bergsma!!!

October 14th 2010, Page A3

Direct quote: “The unemployed Merritton environmentalist is campaigning on an allegation that city hall is corrupt because a neighbour’s fine for failing to shovel a snowy walk was reversed when the neighbour was able to offer a satisfactory explanation to city staff and promised to shovel his sidewalk in the future.”


All the evidence including the transcript and voice recording of Councillor Stevens’ answering machine message is on this blog. The Standard has censorsed the truth from the public for months. Now in an election campaign Mayor McMullan has fear that the truth is made public so Bergsma lies to save him. Why else would Bergsma make a public lie, an intentional lie, have it published and distributed in the thousands including on the web?

You are a liar Bergsma! First of all Mark Leeson is not a neighbour, look at a map of Merritton.

You are a liar Bergsma! Second lie, I have not said at any time, including to you, that city hall is corrupt. I have said that Mayor McMullan is corrupt! I have said that Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens is corrupt!

You are a liar Bergsma! Third lie, the By-Law fine under By-Law 2008-315 was not reversed by city staff. The lawful by-law fine was fixed by Mayor McMullan. Mark Leeson had tried to explain to city staff that he had gone away to Cuba and was not there to shovel the snow. City staff told him that as he knew he was going to be away from home he should have organised that someone shovel his sidewalk. Lesson was told the fine stood. He then called Councillor Stevens and the result was the answering machine message.

You are a liar Bergsma! Fourth lie, the explanation by Leeson was not taken as satisfactory and he was told the fine stood.

You are a liar Bergsma! Fifth lie, Mark Leeson never promised anyone at city that he would shovel his sidewalk in the future.

When Mark Leeson read this he could only laugh at you and your lies.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Who put Marlene Bergsma, a St.Catharines Standard long time staff reporter to lie? Who has everything to lose once I take legal action? Who has lied to the public? Who has a campaign on nothing but falsehoods? Who has a political career in jeopardy when the truth is fully public? Mayor McMullan! Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens! I have never said anything about city hall. I have said and still say now Mayor McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens are corrupt. Mayor McMullan is in breach of the Municipal Act. Mayor McMullan is in breach of the Charter of Rights. Mayor McMullan has committed perjury of Oath of Office. Councillor Stevens has breached the Municipal Act, Charter of Rights and has perjured her Oath of Office. Marlene Bergsma has lied and her superiors allowed the lie to be published. There has to be a reason.

The actions by Councillor Stevens and Mayor McMullan have also brought more action. A local newsletter published by The Winners Circle had broken the story in their Summer Edition. They printed a transcript of Councillor Stevens’ answering machine message. Truth is a dangerous weapon to corrupt elected public servants. Councillor Stevens didn’t like this at all. Her mother, Mrs. Pat Lindal didn’t like this at all. Now Mrs. Pat Lindal is a candidate in the Municipal Elections for Regional Council. Mrs. Pat Lindal if elected would have to swear an oath to serve the community and all its members equally and fairly without bias. Mrs. Pat Lindal didn’t like the fact her little girl was caught committing a corrupt act. Mrs Pat Lindal didn’t like the fact that this corrupt act by her little Jennie was being made public. So Mrs. Pat Lindal sent harassing letters to all the small businesses who advertised in the newsletter. That was not enough to these corrupt cowards as threatening and harassing phone calls by male and female voices followed to the same business owners. Mrs. Pat Lindal is asking the people, all the people to trust her and elect her to serve them equally, pretty much the same as what her daughter did. Mrs. Pat Lindal committed an act of harassment, threat and bullying.

I contacted the Ministry for Municipal Affairs as they administer the Municipal Elections Act. I was instructed by representatives of the ministry to inform the local police as this is a criminal act and to take legal action to enforce the Municipal Elections Act. I have sent everything to the police under the attention of Chief Southall. No action to date. Mrs. Pat Lindal has been served written notice that legal action is being filed by the publisher of The Winners Circle newsletter, with two witnesses present and Lindal’s voice recorded as she accepted the written notice.

Mrs. Pat Lindal has shown not only her contempt of law but contempt of what it would mean to serve the community in elected public office. Her acts of harassment, threat and bullying are that of a despicable fraud. There were 20 letters sent and numerous phone calls. Her daughter’s corruption was something she wanted to hide.



Monday, May 31, 2010

A Fine "Fix-ed"?

(Can a Mayor Fix a Fine?)

(Original posting : 11 May 2010 )

Under what power or law can a Mayor make a fine/invoice issued as a by-law infringement disappear? Listen to the recording of a voice left on an answering machine. This is a message by a City Councillor left on the answering machine of an individual who asked for help. The councillor approached the Mayor and the Mayor decided to do as he wished with the law. As citizens of this country we are proud of our way of life, of our equality and quality of life. We have sent brave Canadians to foreign lands because we believe that our Canadian ideal of justice and equality is worth emulating. Our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers stand bravely shoulder to shoulder in our Canadian uniforms and sadly some have paid the ultimate price with their lives. Equality is the cornerstone of democracy. Our Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees equality for all Canadians before and under the law. The Charter does not see small or big laws, but all laws.

The individual had gone to Cuba for a couple of weeks. When he left the grass was green. While he was away it snowed. He wasn’t there to shovel the snow. City employees did shovel his snow. A fine/invoice was sent to him under BY-LAW 2008-315. On his return the individual called the St. Catharines Public Works Department and tried to explain. He told City employees that he was away in Cuba and was not able to clean his sidewalk. He said that his partner is handicapped and unable to clean the snow. The City employees told him that as he knew that he was going to Cuba he should have arranged for a neighbour or someone to shovel his sidewalk and the by-law fine stood. Then the individual called his City Councillor for help in the issue. The result is this message from the Councillor on the answering machine.

Premier Dalton McGuinty was provided with all the details. He replied that it was Minister Bradley’s responsibility as Minister for Municipal Affairs. Minister Bradley’s reply to me is a contradiction to the Premier’s instructions. The essence of all law in Canada is equality in its application. What of those who paid their fines? What of the Charter of Rights? No one in elected public office has the legal right to make a fine disappear or be “taken care of.” There is a proper and legal way to object to an unjust fine and it had already been tried. It is your voice as the people of St. Catharines, of Canada that counts now.

The Documents

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Transcript of phone message

Transcript of Councillor’s phone message on answering machine:

“Hi, Mark Jenn Stevens calling I met with Mayor McMullan and the engineering department, Dan Dillon and Mike Wilson yesterday in regards to your water um, damage and that ah, occurred in your yard as well as your snow shovelling um, invoice.

"The Mayor is going to look after your snow shovelling invoice so you won’t have to pay that, so you can put that aside. Um, I’ll have a letter of to follow up on that um, so you don’t have to pay it, and I’ll drop that out to you.

"Also they will be digging a trench from 20 feet from the east side of um, Sun Collision all the way down to back to the park’s department shovelling the water into the drain-off that goes off of Merritt Street so hopefully that will alleviate a lot of your water problems. Um, thank you very much and ah, we’ll keep in touch, thank you and take care.”

(Original posted 26 May 2010)

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Letter Two

Alexander Davidoff
53 Almond Street
St. Catharines, Ontario
L2T 1G2

May 24, 2010

Premier Dalton McGuinty
The Premier of Ontario
Legislative Building
Queen’s Park
Toronto, Ontario, M7A 1A1

Dear Premier McGuinty,

Yes I know I have sent you a letter already informing you of the Blog. Yet events over the last couple of days require that I keep you up to date Premier as I also do so on the Blog.

On Friday May 21st 2010 an apparent attempt was made to have the audio removed from the Blog. I had been informed this can only be done if a complaint had been made that it was offensive. The truth often is offensive in particular to corrupt politicians on any level. It took several hours but we had been able to solve that problem and make the audio available again to anyone who wishes to listen.

Then in the early hours of Sunday May 23rd 2010 more insane acts. I was alerted by neighbours later in the morning that my front garden was attacked. I have provided here copies of my letter to Chief Southall of the NRP, some photos and the Blog update so as to save you from taking time on the computer keyboard. Heck I am horrible with the one finger method and just trying to be helpful sir.

Humour is my release Premier but this is no laughing matter nor a coincidence. I have children and my photo is on the Blog. I have every reason to be concerned. Plus here the police only take phone reports on intimidation and harassment; soon it will be “at the tone of the beep record your report.” The ‘beep’ is to black out something more unprintable.

It now seems that the fight for the truth in Canada is met with attempted censorship and when that doesn’t work than intimidation and harassment. Here the truth is politically not only inconvenient but down right dangerous for some! In our Canada can something like this be possible! Truth is wilder than fiction it seems.
I am not going to repeat myself read the letter to the Chief of the NRP, Southall and look at the photos for yourself. Now this flyer here promoting the Blog is being prepared to be delivered by volunteers in the thousands all over St. Catharines. Corrupt cowards have made attempts to smother the truth and then when that didn’t work, intimidation was their choice. Our reply is simple make it wider now! Make it more public now!

You are the Premier of Ontario and trust in you to show dignity and faith in our system of government, even if it’s only because we have no choice. You as the Premier of Ontario cannot shrug off responsibility to “Honourable” Jim, and leave it at that. We the people of St. Catharines demand action and will make this as loud as we can, take the fight for the truth as far as is needed. This is not something you can sweep under the rug and hope it will go away Premier McGuinty.

This too will be posted on the Blog.

Sincerely yours,

Alexander Davidoff.

Letter One

Alexander Davidoff
53 Almond Street
St. Catharines, Ontario
L2T 1G2

May 24, 2010

Chief Wendy Southall
Niagara Regional Police
68 Church Street
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 3C6

Re: Incident Report #10-44914

Dear Chief Southall:

This report was only taken over the phone and I was told that an officer will call within 48 hours by phone. Photos attached show what had happened with a written description attached. Without hesitation this was deliberate attempt at intimidation and harassment. I have no way of proving who had done this and therefore can not in dignity make accusations. Yet without hesitation I say it was because of my Blog and Facebook.



On Friday an apparent attempt was made to block the audio recording from being heard. I have demanded an explanation and clarification in writing. Only a complaint that the audio was offensive and I have been informed it would create a block. I was able to get around the block and have the audio open again in a matter of hours. No such further attempts would be successful. Look at the Blog and the material.

From the photos you will see that a vehicle had mounted the sidewalk deliberately as scratches were made on the concrete. This was not an out of control vehicle not the angle it had mounted to the intersection. The vehicle then crossed over the City Garden with tire imprints clear over the planted material. At this point it is only 6 feet in width to my Juniper shrub and it was not disturbed. The vehicle then moved forward on a curve approximately some 30 feet not damaging anything in a space only 5’11” (five foot, eleven inches) to 5’8” (five foot, eight inches) in width. A dry stacked stone wall at the other end of my front yard was then pulled apart. Stones have been taken/stolen and the vehicle then crossed again over City planted material; again vehicle tire imprints are clear over the sidewalk and onto Glendale Avenue. A yellow fire hydrant is opposite the stone wall of my garden which was vandalised and only approximately 5’8” (five foot, eight inches) of space in between, yet the fire hydrant not even scratched.

This was intentional! This was deliberate! This was not simple vandalism! Whoever did this intended it to be unsettling, to be intimidating. There is no coincidence here not with the apparent attempt to block the audio on Friday on the Blog and then this. My garden walls have been up for some eight years and never anything like this. My photograph is on the Blog and address clear, I have to be concerned what could be next. In all fairness I could not provide a witness or a description of a vehicle to the dispatch on the phone yet I did get less than expected in return from your NRP.

I have provided all this to you Chief so that there is an official record on file not a simple phone call. This letter will be posted also on the Blog.


Alexander Davidoff.

An Update to a Fine ‘Fix-Ed’ - May 25th 2010

On Friday May 21st 2010 an apparent attempt had been made to silence the truth. It has not been clarified as yet but clarification has been demanded if a block had been placed on the audio recording due to a complaint it was offensive. Though we were able to work around the apparent block and still provide everyone the audio within some hours I apologise to anyone who had wanted to listen and was not able to. It would seem that the truth indeed is a dangerous inconvenience.

Then on Sunday May 23rd 2010 my home, or the front yard in particular was vandalised - some photos attached. Was this some form of harassment or intimidation? My front garden has been as is for over eight years now and never touched. It is too much of a coincidence I think, in particular as I don’t believe in coincidences.

In font of my house on Almond Street is a City of St. Catharines garden. It is along Glendale Avenue into Almond Street. Whoever it was came with a vehicle onto the City Garden area, tire tracks are clearly imprinted and had not hit the yellow fire hydrant with only approximately 5’9” (five foot, nine inches) of width plus whoever had not mowed down my Juniper bush opposite the fire hydrant! Only to stop, attack my dry stacked stone circular garden wall, steal a number of stones and leave at the other end over the City Garden leaving tire imprints. This was intentional and deliberate the area narrow from end to end approximately 6’ (six foot) down to 5’9” (five foot, nine inches). Marks on the sidewalk show the vehicle mounting, no tire marks on the street and the angle proves it was not a drunk driver or I would have no wall at all.

This happened in the early hours of Sunday morning the 23rd. On Friday the 21st the audio was apparently attempted to be blocked, yet we got around that. A report made to the police, Incident Report #10-44914 though it appears an officer will only do a phone call on this. A letter and photos sent to Chief Southall of the Niagara Regional Police in case the facts may be needed for the record. This was intentional harassment and intimidation. I won’t stop fighting for the truth, the equality we all demand as Canadians and our City of St. Catharines.

Raise your voices if you find the material compiled here to be unacceptable. It seems the truth now in Canada is not tolerated. All updates will be posted.

Sunday, May 23, 2010