Thursday, March 24, 2011

Update: March 24 2011

The Mayorgate Blog has reached a point where all the evidence has been presented, proving without a doubt the corrupt act by Mayor Brian McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens. Mayorgate has provided clear evidence of the involvement of The Standard as a newspaper to influence the outcome of an election. Marlene Bergsma’s intentional lie written and published which had to have approval of both City Editor Rick VanSickle and Managing Editor Andrea Kriluck, later followed and repeated by reporter Peter Downs again with editorial approval. City Editor Rick VanSickle now dumped. Yet one reporter of The Standard a ‘hatchling’ reporter as I refer to him later in the update has been left till last.

Matthew Van Dongen a reporter who knew me well enough had all the information of the corruption from the first week of June. His e-mail to me dated June 7th 2010 is now posted and my comments on it in this update. You Matthew Van Dongen bumble through the e-mail in a ludicrous fashion, misreading and fumbling in a fashion that insults journalism. But as I said I speak of your bumbling e-mail in more detail further in this update, here I have a clear question for you and it’s not a comfortable one. Knowing about the corrupt act, hearing the voice of Councillor Jennie Stevens confirm that Mayor McMullan fixed a lawful By-Law fine, yet you wrote the piece “McMullan says e-mail smeared everyone at city hall” on October 5th 2010. There is more of your brilliant journalism following on October 15th and October 23rd 2010. Each and every time you wrote themes to destroy the credibility of the truth! Each and every time you Matthew Van Dongen knew of the corrupt act committed by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens and of the role of your newspaper played. You quoted Andrew Gill as saying “I think there is a lot of disappointment in the community that the election has come to this.” You and your bunch at The Standard made sure that the community never knew the truth.

Matthew Van Dongen was made aware of the corrupt act in June 2010. Matthew Van Dongen heard the voice of City Councillor Jennie Stevens confirm that Mayor McMullan made a lawful By-Law fine ‘go away.’ An illegal act not permitted under the Municipal Act. Matthew Van Dongen e-mailed me with an insane response. Matthew Van Dongen did not do this on his own authority, no, he had to refer to his editors. Yet Matthew Van Dongen wrote columns on October 15th, 16th, and 23rd with one goal and theme, to destroy the credibility of the truth and to mislead the people of St.Catharines in the final weeks of an election.

The actions taken by The Standard its reporters and editors, together with the action of the Niagara Regional Police demand answers and even investigation. An election had been influenced and evidence tampered with! I will not stop asking questions nor stop fighting for the truth regardless.


Before I take you through the current update to Mayorgate Blogspot I have a question to both Chief Wendy Southall of the Niagara Regional Police Service and to NRP officer Cataldo. On October 22nd 2010 I had an officer come to my home and spend over half an hour asking questions regarding Councillor Stevens’ mother Pat Lindal and her criminal harassment of business owners. This officer knew he was being recorded and he had no reason to “cut it short” and run. Now this was two days before officer Cataldo and his now famous visit. This officer also made it clear on how to handle a By-Law fine if you think it unfair and you can hear his voice following this. So Chief Southall if your police already came to get details on the Pat Lindal affair how is it that officer Cataldo followed his line of questioning? Why? For what purpose? Now we are not going to go over the Cataldo Incident Report #2010-103419 all over again or the voice recording of officer Cataldo in my home, but the questions are hanging in the air Chief Southall. As this officer came on October 22nd 2010 at approx., 11:00 a.m. it was later that same afternoon at approx., 3:35 p.m. October 22nd 2010 that Mayor McMullan had his secretary call me and make the threat that he had gone to his Toronto lawyers as I called him corrupt. Wow that threat sent the shiver of the Gods through me. Then on October 24th 2010 the Cataldo “you obviously know why we are here,” visitation. Chief Southall anything sound suspicious here or is it purely circumstantial and coincidental?

Listen To Partial Of The Recording Of NRP Officer From October 22nd 2010 And His Comments On How To Handle A By-Law Fine

I started this blog some nine months ago simply because the main newspaper The Standard decided to wilfully censor the truth from the public. It all began with a corrupt act committed by Mayor Brian McMullan and Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens. A lawful By-Law fine issued to an individual was fixed by Mayor McMullan. This is a breech of the Municipal Act, breach of Oath of Office and in fact breach of our Charter of Rights. The telephone answering machine message left by Councillor Stevens was clear and left no questions, yet the truth was both damaging and very dangerous as Mayor Brian McMullan had already made it clear that he was going for re-election.

At the time the other newsprint delivered to our homes twice a week, I don’t know if I’d call it a 'newspaper' as it is either too late with some news or too early for the rest, decided that slander might work. Its main reporter, and at the time City Editor Mike Zettel decided to slander me to the one individual Mark Leeson at the center of the situation. Mike Zettel of Niagara This Week told Mark I had a “hard-on for the mayor” that I had a “vendetta for the mayor.” Instead of dealing with facts Mike Zettle of Niagara This Week slandered me. I guess Mike Zettle thought if you can’t destroy the message then destroy the messenger. Mr. Mike Williscraft Head of Editorial at Niagara This Week called Mark who was fined and tried in a conversation lasting over 30 minutes to change his mind, in fact to tamper with or interfere with a witness. It didn’t work for Mike Williscraft. Mike Williscraft in the end did not dispute the fact of the ‘ticket fixing’ but referred to it as “after all only a small thing.” You can listen to Mike Williscraft Head of Editorial at Niagara This Week following this update, and yes it was recorded.

Listen To The Director Of Editorial Mike Williscraft Of Niagara This Week 'newspaper' Try And Change The Mind Of An Individual Regarding Slander By His Reporter Mike Zettel

So I had no choice and decided to nominate myself in the Mayoral Race. The only media in town decided to censor the facts of a corrupt act by Mayor Brian McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens. Yet both were coming to the people of this city asking for trust and faith for a new term in office. Slander by Mike Zettle of Niagara This Week didn’t work. An attempt by Head of Editorial at Niagara This Week Mike Williscraft to interfere with the witness to the slander didn’t work. I had no idea to what lengths this would extend.

During the election campaign it wasn’t enough for The Standard to simply censor the truth of the corrupt act by Mayor Brian McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens. Our Provincial Government in the form of Minister Jim Bradley, Minister for Municipal Affairs, who administers the Municipal Act, friend to Mayor Brian McMullan walked away from his responsibility. Premier Dalton McGuinty famous for his hands on approach in governing our province did the washing of the hands and delegated to Minister Jim Bradley. The Standard now went further as mere censorship wasn’t working. Marlene Bergsma wrote an intentional LIE. Andrea Kriluck Senior Editor approved the LIE, Rick VanSickle City Editor approved the LIE and more, Peter Downs reporter wrote and repeated not only the LIE but the whole editorial merry-go-round process.

Rick VanSickle is now gone as City Editor only days after the March 7th update and his voice recording. His departure came after a meeting with Publisher Judy Bullis and Editor Andrea Kriluck on Thursday 10th March. To you Andrea Kriluck I say this, do not dare pretend you did not know any of this or were not a part of this. Do not think you can dump only on Rick VanSickle. In the first week of June 2010 I hand delivered all the details about the blog and the ’fixing’ of the By-Law fine to your reporter Matthew Van Dongen. Now Matthew Van Dongen may be considered as a hatchling reporter, after all not of the standing of Marlene Bergsma, he sure as hell would not have authority on an issue such as this on his own. Matthew Van Dongen reporter of The Standard sent me an e-mail dated June 7th 2010. Reporter Matthew Van Dongen starts off that he has my letter and that he is “taking a look at the website now.” He proceeds to jabber about my letter and “misreading.” If I was to post a copy of my letter to reporter Matthew Van Dongen it would turn out to be most embarrassing to Matthew and his ability to read the written word. I always wanted to ask reporter Matthew Van Dongen was he typing out his e-mail response which appears on the computer screen while it was attempting to show “the website.” Or did he type the e-mail then “look at the website.” Or did he “look at the website” and then type the e-mail. Heck, maybe I am “misreading” his e-mail and well he could “set me straight.” In any case however he did it, he did it with referral to his editor, and under no circumstances did Matthew Van Dongen have authority on his own. A great deal was “unclear” to Matthew Van Dongen it seems.

Someone should explain the law to ‘grasshopper’ Matthew Van Dongen. A lawful fine issued cannot be simply cancelled by bureaucrats in particular a Mayor. There is a system of law the alternative is called ‘corruption.’ So Andrea Kriluck still want to try and wash your hands of this. Then do you remember during the election you called me on the phone? When brilliant ’grasshopper’ Matthew Van Dongen messed up my name and I left a complaint on Bullis’ answering machine, it was you Andrea Kriluck who called me with your false apologies, it was not VanSickle hell he did call me but later and for a different reason as you all have heard now. You called me Andrea Kriluck Managing Editor. You knew and approved the LIE and cannot walk away from the responsibility or the consequences.

Yet I had no idea how far this would go or how dangerous this blog had become. It is clear now that The Standard in its intentional LIE went a long way to influence the outcome of an election. Marlene Bergsma wrote an intentional and premeditated LIE, editors VanSickle and Kriluck approved the LIE, Peter Downs repeated the LIE and Matthew Van Dongen, well ’grasshopper’ simply “misread” the facts it seems. But that wasn’t enough. The Niagara Regional Police were used to destroy the credibility of the evidence, of the facts. Constable Cataldo wrote an official government document in the form of an Incident Report #2010-103419 and it was a LIE! Incident Reports are used as evidence in a court of law! They have been used to destroy people and even when someone had claimed but not proven that a police officer coloured the truth a judge sides with the police and their sworn Incident Report! A larger question is, as an official government record who else had access to that document, and please don’t carry on too loudly on the confidentiality issue of these things. The Niagara Regional Police decided to investigate this. WHY? Why now only a few weeks before the election? I wrote Chief Wendy Southall on May 24th 2010 explaining vandalism to my home and about the blog. Chief Wendy Southall at the Niagara Regional Police knew of the blog since May 24th 2010 yet no one from the Niagara Regional Police came to investigate anything! My evidence of the corrupt act by Mayor Brian McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens was there for her to see, did it need time to mature? Why no NRP investigation then or for months later? My letter to Chief Southall is posted here and more. When Pat Lindal candidate for Regional Council and mother of Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens threatened, harassed and terrorised small business owners by mail and phone calls for one reason only and that was simply because they advertised in a newsletter that made public the Mayorgate Blog and what Councillor Jennie Stevens and Mayor McMullan had done, I wrote Chief Wendy Southall of the Niagara Regional Police again.

Here we have the Criminal Code breached with premeditation and intent, yet no NRP investigation. A candidate decides, a momma, that the truth of her 'little girl’s' corruption would be too damaging so she - momma - harasses, threatens, and terrorises business owners for placing a small add in a publication. Yet the Niagara Regional Police did nothing! Well a constable did come to me, yes I have it all recorded. This constable of the Niagara Regional Police Service does state that there is only one legal way to handle a fine that was issued. Yet no detectives, no investigation, nothing! Can you answer that Chief Wendy Southall? Who sent the NRP to 'investigate' only when panic set in? Why was there no care from the NRP in June, July, August, September in the evidence that was carried on the Mayorgate Blog? Yet only a few weeks before the election your police lie on an Incident Report, and as stated in writing by another candidate make statements to him that were a lie regarding the whole issue of the corrupt act by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens. Those 'detectives' saw and read the original fine and saw the assessment of it! Those ’detectives’ heard the voice of Councillor Jennie Stevens! Maybe they are like 'grasshopper Matthew Van Dongen of The Standard and “misread” facts and evidence? Yet on October 26th Mayor Brian McMullan was able to crow on the front page of The Standard in a story written by Bergsma that there was nothing to the blog and the evidence against him.

A corrupt act by Mayor McMullan and Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens escalated to the destruction of the very basis of what we are as Canadians. Drawn in to the destruction The Standard printed an intentional LIE written by Marlene Bergsma, approved by editors Andrea Kriluck and Rick VanSickle (VanSickle now gone from The Standard after only days of the March 7th update to this blog and his voice made public) repeated again by reporter Peter Downs, and bumbled by reporter Matthew Van Dongen. The intentional lie is liable! That was not enough. The Niagara Regional Police aware of the details for months before the election now are used to discredit and tamper with the evidence. A police force was used to influence the outcome of an election! I guess we do have a banana republic minus the beautiful palm trees. In a democracy this is both shocking and alarming. Even though the actions of both The Standard newspaper and the Niagara Regional Police are devastating to the whole of the City of St.Catharines no less. Each and every councillor on the City Council knew months prior to the election of the 'fixing' of the fine by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens. I handed out my flyer at the doors prior to the regular Council meeting directly to the hands of those entering. One councillor even after reading with stern face gave it back to me.

St. Andrews Councillor Joseph Kushner you knew!

St. George Councillor Peter Secord and Greg Washuta you knew!

St. Patricks Councillor Mark Elliott you knew!

Grantham Councillors Dawn Dodge and Bill Phillips you knew!

Port Dalhousie Councillors Len Stack and Bruce Williamson you knew!

And ex-councillor Heather Foss you knew!

Ex-councillor Andrew Gill you knew of the corrupt act and you publicly attacked the evidence in defence of Mayor McMullan. Not only were you willing to ignore the corruption but went so far as to publicly lie and attack. Now ex-councillor Andrew Gill you are going to ask for the trust of Canadians as a Federal Candidate for the Liberals.

You all knew of the corrupt act. I am so proud of each and every one of you for how you stood up for Canada, our ideals, our laws. Each and every one of you took an oath, swore on a bible but then I guess it was only a book, a prop.

I intentionally waited till the last few days before filing my financial paperwork as a candidate. Now the City Clerk did send me a second set of forms to remind me as a Final Notice on February 22nd 2011. Then in early March I received an e-mail to remind me to file my financial paperwork. All this concern by the City Clerk for financial statements yet that same City Clerk well aware of the breach of the Municipal Act had stayed silent. The City Clerk administers the Municipal Act and the Municipal Elections Act. Our City Solicitor Annette Poulin, sworn to an oath to uphold and administer the law. Our City Solicitor Annette Poulin knew of the corrupt act committed by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens. What did City Solicitor Annette Poulin do? NOTHING! What did our City Clerk do? NOTHING!

Mayor Brian McMullan and Merritton Councillor Jennie Stevens committed a corrupt act. The Standard newspaper printed an intentional LIE written by reporter Marlene Bergsma, approved by both City Editor Rick VanSickle and Managing Editor Andrea Kriluck, repeated a second time by reporter Peter Downs, and the whole censorship starting by bumbling reporter Matthew Van Dongen. The Niagara Regional Police had officers LIE on an Incident Report and other officers LIE and attempt to discredit evidence, to in fact tamper with the evidence. All for what, for the benefit of what individual? The outcome of an election had been influenced with full premeditation and intent. Can this happen in Canada? Can it be allowed?

This update is an overview of the horrendous act of corruption committed by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens, the intentional lies and the involvement of a newspaper and a police force to influence an election and destroy our foundation of government in Canada. It would be thought impossible in Canada, but the proof provided throughout Mayorgate Blog is undeniable. It has been 10 months of hell but I won’t stop fighting for our ideals and the values I taught my children. It is time now to prepare for the next stage.

As always you will be kept informed as more information comes available.

  Alexander Davidoff
  53 Almond Street
  St. Catharines, Ontario
  L2T 1G2
  May 24, 2010

Chief Wendy Southall
Niagara Regional Police
68 Church Street
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 3C6

Re: Incident Report #10-44914

Dear Chief Southall:

This report was only taken over the phone and I was told that an officer will call within 48 hours by phone. Photos attached show what had happened with a written description attached. Without hesitation this was deliberate attempt at intimidation and harassment. I have no way of proving who had done this and therefore can not in dignity make accusations. Yet without hesitation I say it was because of my Blog and Facebook.



On Friday an apparent attempt was made to block the audio recording from being heard. I have demanded an explanation and clarification in writing. Only a complaint that the audio was offensive and I have been informed it would create a block. I was able to get around the block and have the audio open again in a matter of hours. No such further attempts would be successful. Look at the Blog and the material.

From the photos you will see that a vehicle had mounted the sidewalk deliberately as scratches were made on the concrete. This was not an out of control vehicle not the angle it had mounted to the intersection. The vehicle then crossed over the City Garden with tire imprints clear over the planted material. At this point it is only 6 feet in width to my Juniper shrub and it was not disturbed. The vehicle then moved forward on a curve approximately some 30 feet not damaging anything in a space only 5’11” (five foot, eleven inches) to 5’8” (five foot, eight inches) in width. A dry stacked stone wall at the other end of my front yard was then pulled apart. Stones have been taken/stolen and the vehicle then crossed again over City planted material; again vehicle tire imprints are clear over the sidewalk and onto Glendale Avenue. A yellow fire hydrant is opposite the stone wall of my garden which was vandalised and only approximately 5’8” (five foot, eight inches) of space in between, yet the fire hydrant not even scratched.

This was intentional! This was deliberate! This was not simple vandalism! Whoever did this intended it to be unsettling, to be intimidating. There is no coincidence here not with the apparent attempt to block the audio on Friday on the Blog and then this. My garden walls have been up for some eight years and never anything like this. My photograph is on the Blog and address clear, I have to be concerned what could be next. In all fairness I could not provide a witness or a description of a vehicle to the dispatch on the phone yet I did get less than expected in return from your NRP.

I have provided all this to you Chief so that there is an official record on file not a simple phone call. This letter will be posted also on the Blog.


Alexander Davidoff.

 Alexander Davidoff
 53 Almond Street
 St. Catharines, Ontario
 L2T 1G2

 October 6, 2010

Chief Wendy Southall
Niagara Regional Police
68 Church Street
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 3C6

Dear Chief Southall,

I am bringing to your attention an issue that I have been advised to do so by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs. Here a candidate for Regional Council has committed threat, harassment and bullying of advertisers in a newsletter. Due to the fact that this individual is a candidate I had contacted the Ministry as they administer the Municipal Elections Act. In return I have been advised by a representative of the ministry that this is an act of criminal harassment I should inform the police immediately. This same individual verbally attacked my two children as they delivered the newsletter and I have her recorded.

Mrs. Pat Lindal sent harassing and threatening letters to all the advertisers of the newsletter published by Winners Circle. No advertiser has influence over content. No individual has the right to threaten or harass an advertiser when she doesn’t like something in the publication. It would be a different situation if she as a customer felt she was wronged by a business and stated so by telling that business she would not recommend them to anyone or that she herself would not frequent that business again. That is not the case here. Mrs. Pat Lindal threatened and harassed businesses, 20 of them, so as to force them to not advertise in the newsletter. No one has the right to harass or threaten. This was intentional and criminal action. The intent here was clear to harass and prevent these businesses from carrying out their normal functions, not because of decisions they made but only because of threat and harassment. That is criminal intent.    

I have been in contact with the Minister for Municipal Affairs and representatives of the ministry. Issues relating to the Municipal Elections Act I have been told have to be resolved through court, yet it was made clear to me that harassment and threat are police issues. I was advised to contact you immediately.

No one in this country has the right to threaten and harass anyone. Our laws are in place to protect all equally. Pat Lindal has shown total disregard for the law and must face the consequences of her actions. Letters of threat were not the only method used in this campaign of harassment. Phone calls have been made to several of the businesses. These calls were made by both male and female voices who do did not identify themselves. The phone calls have apparently upset and frightened one establishment to such a degree they refused contact with the publisher of the newsletter. How can this be permitted? How is this not criminal intent?

Referring directly to the Criminal Code - Criminal Harassment:
No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them  (2b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them.

We have had our differences, and I’ll fight for what is right yet both as a candidate for mayor and as a member of this community I believe that the Police must make their own choices for our combined future. No buildings or arguments can do this, only the members the men and women of the force can. Here I ask you the police to enforce the law and stop such harassment, threat and bullying from ever happening again. People, and more than one, have been threatened and harassed from making a free choice. You the police have been made aware of this and you must act.


Alexander Davidoff.

Alexander Davidoff
53 Almond Street
St.Catharines, Ontario
L2T 1G2

March 17, 2011.

Mr. Pierre Karl Peladeau, CEO
612 St. Jacques
Montreal, Quebec, H3C 4M8

Dear Mr. Peladeau:

I wrote you twice, once on October 12th 2010 and then October 28th 2010 pleading for help in this situation. I thought that a man of your stature who made his millions from Canadians and Canada would have some care for what we stand for in this country. Under no circumstances did I think you would ignore what your newspaper The Standard had done. YOU DID! It seems to me that hockey pucks and hockey teams are of greater importance than the role your newspaper played in the fixing of an election. Marlene Bergsma, Rick VanSickle, Andrea Kriluck, Peter Downs, all Sun Media staff and all Quebecor staff in term. Now according to a Sun Family Blog, VanSickle is out only days after my blog mayorgate carried the latest update on March 7th. VanSickle`s cowardly voice loud and clear for all to hear. The evidence on the Mayorgate Blog shocking and indisputable. It doesn’t matter where VanSickle runs or hides he will answer questions in the end.

I pleaded with you for the very essence of what we as Canadians stand for, you ignored it all. Your newspaper was part of an intentional cover-up of evidence, and worse printed an absolute LIE about evidence during an election campaign, that extends to tampering with evidence. Your newspaper and staff; reporters and senior editors, became a party to influence the outcome of an election. Yet that didn’t bother you it seems. So I guess only liable will bother you in the end, and dollar value justice.

Thank you from all of us in St.Catharines who care for the dignity of our town. Thank you from all of us Canadians who care for our Canada.


Alexander Davidoff.


Send your comments in privacy to:

McGuinty's Dirtier Ontario Exposed On no ad LIB

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Update March 12 2011

In light of new information that has come forward a further update is necessary with the last piece of proof of the illegal fixing of the fine by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Jennie Stevens.

It has been put in writing by a former candidate in the Mayoral race as such: “The ticket fixing issue was not pursued by NRPS because the person who was supposedly issued a ticket, made it clear to NRPS that no ticket was every (should be ‘ever’ but it appears he does not do spell check) assessed. Or so NRPS has told me.”

This was received by me only a couple of days ago, and a further shock of the NRPS, Niagara Regional Police Service, involvement to destroy the credibility of the evidence against Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens.

First of all Webster’s Dictionary on assess - to set the amount of (a tax, a fine, damages). 2. to impose a fine, tax, or special payment on (a person or property). 3. to impose (an amount) as a fine, tax, etc.

Second the individual who was interviewed by the Detectives of the NRPS, Niagara Regional Police Service, recorded the whole conversation. He showed the Detectives of the NRPS the original ticket issued to him. Those Detectives read out the whole By-Law Infringement and were recorded! He never said anything such as this to any member of the NRPS nor anyone else. This individual has now been labelled a liar by the NRPS! One has to ask why?

To set the legal record straight a copy of the original fine/ticket is now posted for the very first time. It had been mistreated by the occupant at first but had survived with first aid. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL FINE! The date on the Infraction Ticket is MAR 1/010. Within a week the owner of this fine received the assessed value of the fine dated March 8th 2010. It too is posted here! The original fine had never been posted to this date but has to be now in light of this information coming forward.

A highly respected Canadian Journalist, Mr. James Travers wrote a passionate column that won him a National Newspaper Award. I quote but a small piece here now. “It is possible, too, that ministries, bureaucrats and police officers can be forcefully reminded that their public duty is to the people, not to politicians…”

Here in St.Catharines our democratic process of election has been raped for self interest and greed. The only real local newspaper and a Regional Police Service used to destroy and tamper with evidence. WHY? Both have lied about indisputable evidence! Only one individual stood to lose everything if the truth was public.

Canadian Journalist Mr. James Travers finished his column with this as the last words, “If war is too serious to leave to generals, then surely democracy is too important to delegate to politicians.”

I taught my children the immense values of this great country, our Canada. So I say NO!, to Mayor McMullan, Councillor Stevens and Burch, the newspaper St.Catharines Standard, and to Chief Southall and the NRPS. No you will not destroy collectively our Canadian values. You will not tarnish democracy.

Send your comments in privacy if you wish to:

Transcript of Councillor’s phone message on answering  machine  (You can hear the actual voice recording following this in the March 7th update) 

“Hi, Mark Jenn Stevens calling I met with Mayor McMullan and the engineering department, Dan Dillon and Mike Wilson yesterday in regards to your water um, damage and that ah, occurred in your yard as well as your snow shovelling um, invoice.

The Mayor is going to look after your snow shovelling invoice so you won’t have to pay that, so you can put that aside. Um, I’ll have a letter of to follow up on that um, so you don’t have to pay it, and I’ll drop that out to you.

Also they will be digging a trench from 20 feet from the east side of um, Sun Collision all the way down to back to the park’s department shovelling the water into the drain-off that goes off of Merritt Street so hopefully that will alleviate a lot of your water problems. Um, thank you very much and ah, we’ll keep in touch, thank you and take care.”

Send your comments in privacy to:

McGuinty's Dirtier Ontario Exposed On no ad LIB

Monday, March 7, 2011

Blog Update: March 7, 2011

The G20 Summit in Toronto brought horror not only to Ontarians and Canadians, but to all who believe in democracy across the globe. In St. Catharines the Municipal Elections of 2010 should bring outrage from all Canadians. Nowhere in the democratic world could local police and the local press be used in a campaign to destroy evidence of corruption and take the credibility of candidates, smearing, tearing them to shreds. Now read the facts see the proof for yourselves.

On this Blog you have seen clear proof of Mayor McMullan’s corruption and the fixing of a legal fine. You have seen the proof and heard the voice of Merritton Ward City of St.Catharines Councillor Jennie Stevens confirm in her own voice the corruption and the fixing of a legal fine. This was not enough, our newspaper The Standard joined the conspiracy to destroy, to tamper with the evidence during the election. Reporter Marlene Bergsma a 20-plus year veteran of The Standard intentionally lied about the facts, about the evidence. The Standard censored the facts from the public of St.Catharines and then lied! City Editor Van Sickle called me and cried like a coward on the phone, that I had slandered him, Bergsma and the paper. I recorded him. That call is now available on this Blog. I had Mayor McMullan call, though as a brave man he did use his secretary to actually place the phone call to me, he too threatened me with his Toronto lawyers for calling him corrupt. Councillor Stevens threatened me that I will be hearing from her lawyers in August 2010. Where are these lawyers? To have committed slander I would have had to make an accusation without fact or proof. The corruption of Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens is proven with her own very voice. The attempted tampering with the evidence and absolute public lie by Marlene Bergsma, Van Sickle and The Standard was printed in the thousands.

Now the most alarming evidence has been brought forward. The Niagara Regional Police Service had been used as part of a conspiracy to destroy evidence, to damage the credibility of the individual who had uncovered this corruption, and maybe even other candidates in the election. Again I do not make these claims without direct and undisputable evidence.

It has been disclosed in the previous update posted October 28th 2010 that the NRP, Niagara Regional Police were sent to my home by Councillor Stevens and Councillor Burch. This visit was on October 24th 2010. I recorded those two Niagara Regional Police Officers, that recording is now being made available on this Blog. The first words those police officers utter as they enter my home were shocking, yet the whole purpose of the police to come to a candidate and question in the fashion that they did was suspicious. Then as soon as the NRP officers fully realised they were being recorded they ran. WHY? Why fear being on record? I requested a copy of the Incident Report. That took over two months to get. What is in the Incident Report a total shock and proof that the NRP had been used in an attempt to destroy the credibility of evidence that proved Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens had committed a corrupt act.

The Niagara Regional Police Officers LIED! The NRP Officers lied in the Incident Report, which is an official government document presented with the seal of the Niagara Regional Police Service and a cover letter with Chief of Police Wendy E. Southall’s name on the very top. These Officers of the NRP lied just as Bergsma and The Standard did. Why would they? For what purpose? The evidence of corruption was not against the NRP nor The Standard? The full Incident Report #2010-103419 is available here on the Blog. I will take you through it and when you either listen to the recording of these NRP officers or read the full transcript of the recording you will be amazed, shocked and left with the same question I and my lawyers have been.  WHY? 

Click Here To Listen To Officers Of The NRP

Now let’s dissect the Niagara Regional Police Service Incident Report #2010-103419 and its LIES!: The very top of the report is the supposed reason for the police, the NRP, to have come to me. As it states on the Incident Report “for reports of harassing e-mails.” Now either listen to the officers as they enter my home or read the transcript. Besides identifying me as to whom I am the first thing they say is, “you obviously know why we are here.” Words that may not be out of place with a known criminal but shocking to an ordinary person. How the hell could I possibly know why two NRP officers come to my home on a Sunday? Read through the whole transcript of the recorded conversation, no part is missing not even the knock on my door. Is there any mention by the two NRP officers in my home of any e-mails at all? NO! Any questions of whether I sent any e-mails? NO! For the record I had not sent any e-mails to Councillor Stevens nor Councillor Burch. Each was on a list of all candidates in the election of an e-mail I sent chicken woman Sheri Fogel. A ludicrous issue and I sent Fogel an e-mail sending a copy to all municipal candidates. A copy of that is here on the Blog. You are a LIAR Councillor Stevens! You are a LIAR Councillor Burch! Burch did e-mail me to take him off my e-mail list, Stevens did not. Stevens lied again!

Stevens continues to lie. First of all Stevens what “many concerns” do I have with you? LIAR! Councillor Stevens then continues, according to the NRP Officer, that I “attended” her residence three weeks ago. The report and visit was October 24th. Stevens you do have a problem with the truth? I was delivering a newsletter in your neighbourhood on August 24th 2010. By the way I have a son and daughter not daughters, you do have problems with the truth? You did not tell me to remove myself off your property. You Councillor Stevens, liar, came to me two houses past your home and told me not to go on your property again. Problems with the truth or simply selected memory loss Councillor Stevens? You lied to these two NRP Officers over and over. In the report you claim you told me “that if I wanted to talk to you I could through your lawyers.” LIE! I recorded you Stevens August 24th 2010 at 1:45 pm. You threatened me, you said “my lawyers will be getting a hold of you.” LIAR Stevens!

Click On Here To Hear Councillor Stevens' Real Words

I recorded you Councillor Stevens as I did your mother Pat Lindal only minutes later with her cowardly threat and insult. By the way where are your lawyers Councillor Stevens? Maybe you want to claim as Mayor McMullan’s camp did with the supposed answering machine message at his campaign headquarters, The Standard October 23rd 2010. Remember that one, a voice supposedly sounding like Carlos Garcia? Weird that one, Carlos Garcia was a financial supporter of Mayor McMullan’s campaign in 2006. I have a copy of the full disclosure. Hmm… that’s interesting. Anyhow back to you Stevens, you lied to police and they put your lies into an official government document. And by the way, the flyer you got I didn’t deliver it was a volunteer. As a candidate I had questions to two other candidates. In a democracy that’s part of an election, part of democratic process. But then both you and Burch had problems to answer didn’t you?

So now Incident Report #2010-103419 goes into its second part. Paragraph one true. Though my living room only appeared to be so to these NRP Officers. I personally think it’s quite charming and glaringly clear as to its purpose. Now you begin to LIE! Officer Cataldo did you forget that you were recorded? Officer Cataldo when did you mention the word e-mails in the 8 minutes 37 seconds that you were in my home? Look at the transcript, listen to your voice! Why lie? I did tell you I had no issues with her and I never changed that statement! I did not as you proceed to say in paragraph two: “he did in fact have minor issues…” That’s a LIE! Listen to yourself officer! LISTEN TO ME! I never once said anything of the sort, not even close! You never brought up anything regarding e-mails. We will deal with the recorded facts and what you did say in a moment.

Third and last paragraph. You did mention the flyer or pamphlet. I told you a volunteer did the delivery. Now again a lie! You state in your Incident Report #2010-103419 last paragraph: “DAVIDOFF then proceeded to go into a rant about how STEVENS has had issues with him for years and he wanted it documented.” You officer lied! Do you know what the word ‘rant’ means in fact? Listen to my voice I was calm and collected with you from the moment I opened the door to when you made your speedy exit! I DID NOT say anything about ‘documenting’ anything. You officer Cataldo made me out to be a liar and you did this intentionally. WHY? In your Incident Report #2010-103419 you made me to be a person who says one thing and then something else in contradiction. You Officer Cataldo make me out to be a liar. Yet the Incident Report #2010-103419 is the lie and one has to ask, why? The telephone answering message left by Merritton Councillor Jennie Stevens that proves corruption, breach of the Municipal Act and perjury of Oath of Office did not relate to you as an officer of the NRP nor any officer of the NRP. The flyer delivered in the process of an election campaign did not reflect on you or any member of the NRP. Mayor McMullan isn’t a relative? Heck he is a mac… and you’re, well… not. Why would you lie in the Incident Report? You were recorded officer! These were your words officer, “I’m gonna… now that I know I’m being recorded. I’m gonna cut it short…” And you were gone within some 60 seconds. You knew you were being recorded, you even admit in your Incident Report #2010-103419 that I “continued to point at the recording device on the table.”

So now the recorded facts of your attendance in my home. To make it easier you can use the transcript to refer to. You Officer came in with the now famous, “Um you obviously know why we are here.” I won’t bore myself anymore with that. Then you come with “an on-going thing between you and her I guess.” I guess you didn’t know why you were there. So then you proceeded onto “documents served under her mother.” What the hell has that got to do with anything. I thought it was Stevens and Burch who sent you? What has anything in legal terms got to do with the NRP and a civil action. You have no legal right to question anything to do with Stevens’ mother when your Incident Report #2010-103419 opens with “reports of harassing e-mails”??? Nothing at all the right, legal or otherwise of the NRP or why you were sent to my home. I explained in a polite manner. I had no direct involvement nor indirect involvement in that civil action against Stevens’ mother. Stevens lied to you. Why would you question me about Winners Circle in any way? Is it a terrorist cell? Or maybe a Communist group? Has any of this found direct or indirect relation to NRP questioning? The BIG question Officer how come none of this is in your Incident Report #2010-103419? No mention of Stevens’ lies nor of her claiming/telling you I was a witness. How is it she claims and lies about non-existing e-mails according to your Incident Report #2010-103419 but not a word out of you in my home?

So be clear you had no legal right to question me regarding Winners Circle or whether I was a witness as civil action documents were served on Stevens’ mother. Do you have the slightest legal or logical explanation for this? According to you Stevens claimed there was something by me in the publication. She knew that was a lie. If I wrote anything and it was untrue she could serve civil action documents against me. Yet she had the NRP question me instead! WHY?

The lies don’t stop. Now Officer you go on how Stevens and Burch told you they are intimidated by me. Both Stevens and Burch are only intimidated by the truth. Jeff Burch an ex-auxiliary police dude was intimidated by a flyer. Liar! Then you said Stevens had someone “was at her door this morning at five o’clock.” Councillor Stevens you accused me of such an insane act - you are a liar! And again Officer why was none of this in the Incident Report #2010-103419. Somehow I am not an investigator but I would have thought this was heck, important.

I wanted to go and find out more but you Officer knew you were being recorded and ran. WHY? What worried you to be put on record. I now do understand as I and my lawyers have read your Incident Report #2010-103419. After getting the report not finding anything from Jeff Burch there I called Kim Robb Analyst Information & Privacy Unit, in fact twice. I recorded each conversation to confirm this is the only and true report of the incident. When I asked if Burch was in the home of Stevens, Ms. Robb said probably but that she was not there. Then her superior called me on the same issue to confirm this as the only true report and she too could only guess as to Burch being there. You Officer list him as a separate complainant yet Stevens did all the talking. Burch had to of been at the Stevens home? Later in court this will be all brought out, the truth I mean.

Officer Cataldo you lied in your Incident Report #2010-103419 the voice recording proves it. WHY? Councillor Jennie Stevens lied and that’s not a shock, after all Stevens and Mayor McMullan committed an illegal act and perjured their oaths. We have seen and heard of the horrors of the G20 Summit with police brutality to silence freedom of speech. What happened here is far worse. The Niagara Regional Police service was used during an election by the mayor to destroy the credibility of candidates. The newspaper, The Standard not only censored by choice facts, but in fact tampered with the evidence by publishing an absolute lie about it. You Officer Cataldo lied on an official government document. Police Incident Reports are used as evidence in court, they carry the seal of the Niagara Regional Police Service. Yet you slandered me in that document. Both Councillors Stevens and Burch shall be facing slander charges as my lawyers have been asked to prepare this. Without hesitation I demand the truth!

In our country under no circumstances do we see ourselves as some South American or African dictatorship. We have laws and those who enforce them. We have an elected government at any level: federal, provincial and municipal. Elected by a process by the people of this great country. We have sent brave Canadian men and women wearing the uniform of this country proudly to foreign lands to install the ideals of democracy and freedom of speech, what we ourselves proudly enjoy. Some have sadly paid for this with their very lives! Yet here in St.Catharines an election was fixed! One would think impossible in a democracy such as ours. Yet it has! A mayor was able to get the only local press to censor the facts of his corruption and that of a councillor. Mike Williscraft head of Editorial at Niagara this Week, a twice weekly delivered alternative to The Standard, even in a recorded conversation refers to the corruption as “only a small thing.” Not only does the main newspaper censor the facts they even print an absolute lie regarding the facts. Marlene Bergsma Senior Reporter, Peter Downs Reporter, Rick Van Sickle City Editor and Andrea Kriluck Managing Editor are all liars. WHY? The corruption was not relating to them. So who asked Bergsma to lie? 

Click On Here To Hear City Editor VanSickle Cry & Whine

The Niagara Regional Police Service was used to damage the credibility of candidates. Mr. D’Intino, candidate for mayor was attacked and labelled publicly. A strange coincidence that e-mails were the focal point with the smear of Mr. D’Intino. Police were sent to another individual to destroy the credibility of the real evidence that the Mayor feared. Now they went for broke. An Officer of the NRP lied on an Incident Report. WHY? That Officer was recorded and how the hell did he think this was going to pass?

This Blog has brought forward evidence of a corrupt act that never can be allowed in our country, anywhere. Now I present to you the people of not only St.Catharines but all of Canada the clear evidence piece by piece of what is clearly the destruction of evidence with a public lie, the destruction of credibility of candidates in an election and the conspiracy of a Police Service to act outside the law. The actions of one officer reflect on all wearing the uniform. This officer did not do this on his own. Only one individual stood to lose everything if the truth was public and he investigated. Yet every single councillor on the St.Catharines City Council is part of the conspiracy. Each and every one knew of the corrupt act, breach of the municipal act and perjury of Oath of Office. Yet no one had the dignity or courage to stand up for what Canada stands for. Each and every one of you disgust me.

I taught my children this country, our Canada is truly one of the best places in the world. No one has the right to destroy the foundation of government on any level. Not Mayor McMullan, Councillor Jennie Stevens, Councillor Jeff Burch, not the press in the form of lies by Marlene Bergsma and the bunch from The Standard. And not the Niagara Regional Police Service. You as an officer of the law, Officer Cataldo swore an oath to the Crown and to the laws of this land. You as an Officer of the Niagara Regional Police Service lied in an official document and labelled me as a liar. You carried the lies of both Stevens and Burch to an official government document. Yet in my home you made other accusations and questioned issues that under no circumstances would be permitted under law. Then it is the NRP who do nothing with Pat Lindal, Stevens’ mother, who committed threat, terror and harassment. What was your reason officer for the questions regarding the Winners Circle or the civil action against Stevens’ mother? What did that have to do with your Incident Report #2010-103419? Why was everything omitted from the Incident Report #2010-103419? The questions are horrendous and now it is time for the law to sort it all out. Come Mayor McMullan you like a coward on a phone threatened me with lawyers. WHERE ARE THEY? It is time to make all of this public.

Transcript of recording of 2 NRP officers, October 24th 2010
Sent by Councillor Stevens and Councillor Burch
(to the residence of Alexander Davidoff, with wife and 3 children present)

A.D. - Hi.

Officer 1 - Mr. Davidoff.

A.D. - That’s me.

Officer 1 - How are you?

A.D. - Wonderful, come on in.

Officer 1 - Mind if we have a chat?

A.D. - No, not at all.

Officer 1 - O.K. good.

A.D. - Come on in, sit down.

Officer 2 - Everyone’s here.

A.D. - Yea, so we’ve just about to go out to do more of our work.

Officer 1 - Um, you obviously know why we’re here.

A.D. - No.

Officer 1 - O.K. we’re here because Jennie Stevens contacted us today.

A.D. - Oh, yea.

Officer 1 - O.K., in regards to I guess that some issues you’ve guys have had before in the past.

A.D. - I have no idea what issues so you’re gonna have to tell me.

Officer 1 - O.K. She has explained to us that here this has been an ongoing thing between you and her I guess.

A.D. - What is? O.D. - (A.D’s wife): What is ongoing?

Officer 1 - Apparently there’s documents served under her mother.

A.D. - Got nothing to do with me.

Officer 1 - The fact that you were there.

A.D. - I was brought in only as a witness because there was three of us as witnesses. So it has nothing to do with me whatsoever. It’s Preston Haskell, the publisher of a newsletter, nothing to do with me.

Officer 1 - The way that she’s explained.

A.D. - She’s lied.

Officer 1 - We’re not going to take any sides, because she’s contacted us and we are just explaining.

A.D. - She’s said to you that I’ve had something to do with the documents?

Officer 1 - No, she said that the documents served under her mother, you were there.

A.D. - Oh, that was because Preston Haskell asked for several witnesses, there was another individual there as well.

Officer 1 - There was three people there.

A.D. - Correct.

Officer 1 - O.K., so she feels that because you were there and you were directly involved with the complaint.

A.D. - I had no complaint against her. I’ve never made a complaint against her.

Officer 1 - Oh, so there ‘s no complaints, no complaints that are with you against her. O.K., she, what she has explained to us is that there’s this ah, this publication ah, called the Winners, Niagara Winners Circle. Something like that.

A.D. - Winners Circle yea, I can even give you a copy if you want.

Officer 1 - She showed me a copy.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - and I guess, I don’t know a lot about the document, I don’t know what it’s about, um its issues that ah the local residents have about the city and the ah…

A.D. - it’s a newsletter published by a retired…please if you wish make yourself comfortable!

Officer 1 - No, we sit, we sit all day so.

A.D. - O.K., ah it’s a newsletter. Preston Haskell, I don’t know if you’ve heard of him, he was in the mayoral race, he’s a local political, I don’t know what you call, activist, spokesperson. Ah, he’s also one of the premier photographers and his son runs a photography studio. Now, he and a group of retired businessmen have the group called Winners Circle and they publish that newsletter and they get volunteers, anybody who wants to deliver to help them deliver it because they, um, the cost of having it delivered with newspapers is astronomical. That’s, that’s the Winners Circle to give you the background of the Winners Circle.

Officer 1 - O.K., so what she’s explaining to us is that I guess there was something put in there about the way that she’s been running a ward. Ah, there was something actually from you apparently in there.

A.D. - Ah, there is nothing in there from me. And if you’ve looked at it you would have seen there is nothing in there by me. I don’t write for them.

Officer 1 - I wasn’t gonna look at it.

A.D. - But just to let you know, I don’t write for them I don’t do anything. You can confirm everything with Mr. Haskell. I can even give you his phone number if you wish. Ah, Winners Circle has nothing to do with me nor I with them.

Officer 1 - O.K. then why were you there serving a document on her mother?

A.D. - I was not serving it, I was there as a witness. I was not serving anything.

Officer 1 - So what, what connection do you have with the Winners Circle?

A.D. - I know Preston! Mr. Haskell, Preston Haskell, whichever way you want it, right, and I’ve known Preston for a long time, oh, I’m explaining it to you , oh heavens no problem! I’ve known Preston for quite a while ah, we’ve worked on issues such as environmental, um, I was involved in a massive environmental issue here through the Environmental Commissioner, Ministry of Environment, it was huge right, and he wrote about it, in the newsletter, and actually so did both the newspapers um, I’ve known Preston for a long while.

Officer 1 - O.K., um I guess another issue that they were concerned about was, ah, Jeff Burch.

A.D. - aha?

Officer 1 - I guess was concerned that ah because of these issues that Jennie’s been having or she’s thinks she’s been having these issues with you - ah, he received a pamphlet in the mail ah, it was three documents, and one was.

A.D. - It was a flyer?

Officer 1 - Yea, one was a flyer with your information. Another was a um, a flyer with another councillor’s information another one was a, a, issues with the two councillors, the two ah, Merritton ward councillors, um, he was concerned because he was the only one that got that on the whole street he asked…

A.D. - Well, that’s up to the volunteer number one, she, the volunteer ran out of flyers so that was when she delivered three hundred and eighty I think that day.

Officer 1 - O.K.

A.D. - So that’s up to uh Sharon, she ran out so she’s out there trying to do more.

Officer 1 - We’ll say that it’s total coincidence. For some reason they’re concerned for their safety, they’re intimidated by you, O.K. I am just telling you what they told me.

A.D. - O.K., please do.

Officer 1 - They’re intimidated by you, ah.

A.D. - In what way?

Officer 1 - They feel that, ah, well apparently somebody was at her door this morning at five o’clock.

A.D. - Shure as hell wasn’t me. So she can lie all she wants to.

Officer 1 - She didn’t say it was you, she’s concerned it might have been you though because you’ve got something going on with her so, ah…

A.D. - Just to let you know all of its being recorded and continue.

Officer 1 - O.K. (sigh)

A.D. - This is an insanity. But you know, just to let you know, just before she, do you know I am a candidate in the election?

Officer 1 - Yeah.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - She mentioned that, yea.

A.D. - And when as a candidate in any election, if you raise a question regarding another candidate right, how can that individual then carry on with being concerned? This sounds like that moron D’Intino.

Officer 1 - I’m gonna… that I know I’m being recorded I’m gonna cut it short and I’m gonna tell you that she doesn’t want you on her property.

A.D. - I don’t intend to and never have been. I have been once when I was delivering the newsletter.

Officer 1 - She doesn’t want you on her property, Jeff doesn’t want you on his property. O.K.

A.D. - I haven’t been on his property.

Officer 1 - She’s concerned for her safety, and that was addressed to us. So you’ve been told not to go on her property.

A.D. - I guarantee you.

Officer 2 - Or any of your representatives or assistants….

A.D. - Well it’s all been done with, the election finishes tomorrow.

Officer 1 - Just so that you know O.K., and that’s the reason why we’re here.

A.D. - Aha.

Officer 1 - O.K., any questions?

A.D. - Oh god no! Um, Jennie Stevens has claimed, and Burch, that they’re intimidated by me, is that right?

Officer 1 - Right.

A.D. - O.K., and just so that you know for yourselves when we had the Merritton, ah, hall meeting, I forgot the date, all the candidates right, and we made it clear because a lot of residents here have been asking the question of Burch. He’s refused to talk to anyone, it has to do with the environmental issue here. So the flyer that’s out there simply asking the question why do you ignore your Merritton residents, I’m happy to even give you one if you wish. The question to Jennie is again a Merritton residents’ question asking her to explain why are you ignoring, not me, but dozens of residents, right. Ah, once in the summer when the kids and I, we were volunteers and we delivered the newsletter around, she didn’t want the newsletter and I have her recorded and she said to me she doesn’t want me on her property and I told her point blank never again. Ah, volunteers as you might know, they go do a street. They don’t know who lives where, right, they just simply volunteer to deliver a flyer because of the election, so for this woman to claim this I am very happy she has and ah, she’s nuts.

Officer 1 - This has nothing to do with us.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - we’re done here.

A.D. - O.K.

Officer 1 - O.K.

A.D. - Thank you.

Officer 1 - Thank you for that.

A.D. - Thank you very much.

CLICK HERE The Voice Of Councillor Stevens' Answering Machine Message And The By-Law Ticket Fixing

This is the telephone answering machine message by Merritton Ward Councillor Jennie Stevens confirming a lawful by-law fine was fixed by Mayor McMullan. Every effort was made by Mayor McMullan and Councillor Stevens to ensure the people of St.Catharines never had a chance to hear for themselves. Marlene Bergsma of The Standard lied about it in print, so did Peter Downs of The Standard. Rick VanSickle City Editor approved the lie and Andrea Kriluck as Managing Editor did as well. The Niagara Regional Police were used to tarnish and destroy the credibility of candidates and evidence. What else can be interpreted by the Incident Report #2010-103419 filed by an officer of the NRP.

Premier Dalton McGuinty you were made aware of this corrupt act. Premier McGuinty you slipped it onto the Minister for Municipal Affairs at the time Minister Jim Bradley. Minister Jim Bradley you knew of the breach of the Municipal Act!  Minister Jim Bradley you knew of the breach of Oath of Office! As our elected government you both, Premier McGuinty and Minister Bradley did nothing! Both of you Premier McGuinty and Minister Bradley are equally responsible for the destruction of our electoral process, the essence of what we as Canadians stand for.

Both Mayor McMullan and Merritton Ward Councillor Stevens stood to lose everything if the truth was allowed to be public! Listen to the voice of Councillor Stevens and judge for yourself.

I will not stop fighting for the truth. I will not stop fighting for the values I taught my children and the immense value of this great country, Canada.

I will keep this updated as new information comes.

Send your comments to:

Send your comments in privacy to:

McGuinty's Dirtier Ontario Exposed On no ad LIB