Both a title worthy of thought and a question requiring an answer. In a climate where censorship and corruption feed off each other opposition dwindles to a trickle. Power thrives surrounded by the silence of indifference. Often in such a scenario a lone voice standing against such corruption becomes the epitome of a 'David and Goliath' story. Still David was victorious, and that can be repeated today.
In
Canada there is a belief that our rights are guaranteed. No such
guarantee exists, that is the reality. Those who corrupt society
will corrupt everything in the end. Their minions are cowards, their
weapon of choice, intimidation and threat. On Tuesday the 10th
of September, those cowards were unleashed.
It
had been reported that an investigation for breach of Code of Conduct
against City of St. Catharines Councillor Jeff Burch had been filed.
The Standard published the story written by Marlene Bergsma.
Both the name of the councillor and the complainant had been omitted
from the article by Bergsma.
The
Standard has long ceased acting like a newspaper when events
unfold around the city. It was Marlene Bergsma who wrote an article
in 2010, intentionally lying to help cover up corruption. On that
occasion Bergsma lied in print to save Mayor Brian McMullan and
Councillor Jennie Stevens. At the time it was the fixing of a legal
by-law fine by Brian McMullan and the infamous telephone answering
machine message by Jennie Stevens. In the telephone answering machine message that Councillor Jennie Stevens left, she confirmed in
her own voice that the fine had been fixed by Mayor McMullan.
Marlene Bergsma lied about the by-law fine and what she claimed were
facts. This time Marlene Bergsma omits any facts from the story,
disregards the complainant, but does provide a quote by the very same
Councillor Jennie Stevens. No not from a telephone answering machine
but presumably direct to 'reporter' Bergsma. According to Marlene
Bergsma Councillor Jennie Stevens “fears” that the complaint
could be “frivolous or vexatious.”
Councillor
Stevens indeed has fears, she fears that the facts surrounding her
actions and that of fellow Councillor Jeff Burch are made public.
She fears the fact that she became a conspirator in the fixing of a
lawful fine by Mayor Brian McMullan. Although for the moment
Councillor Jennie Stevens can cuddle in a blanket of comfort that
Marlene Bergsma will not provide the people with the truth, and The
Standard will not publish it. Instead Marlene Bergsma does what
she does best in relation to what is the full story.
Marlene
Bergsma then provided another gem of a quote, this one from the city
clerk Bonnie Nistico-Dunk. The city clerk said in relation to the
integrity commissioner, “she could look at the complaint and
throw it out.” Here the
Marlene and Bonnie tag team provide another intentional misconception
with semantics. As the integrity commissioner Suzanne Craig will
request that all the evidence relating to the allegations be
presented by the individual who filed the complaint. She will speak
with that individual, she will without doubt speak with Councillor
Burch and listen to his explanations. In the end it will be up to
the integrity commissioner Suzanne Craig to decide if the evidence
indeed proves the allegations or not.
The
eloquence of the city clerk Bonnie-Nistico Dunk does not reflect the
dollar value of public money paid for her services. Still this is
The Standard and the
intentions were to simply provide the potential groundwork for deceit
once again. As is often the case an article appears on The
Standard's online edition,
stcatharinesstandard.ca, first
allowing comment by readers and others. Here in this arena modern
society has provided a fertile ground for cowards to flourish. Each
of these individuals seems to find a need to hide behind fictitious
names as they add their words of wisdom.
One
such individual using the name Bob Eubanks entered the arena. That
name it uses is false. There is no way to know if it is a he or a
she, so it will be referred to as a 'shim'. Whoever this Bob Eubanks
is, it decided that lies and insult may be added to the intentional
misconceptions already laid done by The Standard and Marlene
Bergsma.
'Shim'
Bob Eubanks takes a swipe at mayorgate.blogspot.com
claiming it is “read by a handful of people.”
For legal purposes a screen capture had been done of the Google
statistics page of the same date as the comment. Mayorgate has grown
to be read in over 16 countries, and the numbers since January 1st
2013 have hit well over 130,000. The reason is simple, unlike
mainstream media with their political alliances, we have no such debt
to pay, or pander to. All the articles published on Mayorgate are
documented with evidence and provided with researched fact.
Mayor Brian McMullan is quite aware of this as he tried to threaten
Mayorgate with legal action. In response Mayorgate published both
his threat and the evidence against him, Mayor Brian McMullan decided
to back off. There are no misconceptions, no lies in the articles
published, and it is a collaboration of more than one to achieve
these standards. It is also a collaboration with people, members of
the community who contact us with information and leads to potential
articles, confident that the information will be handled with
objectiveness and honesty.
This
individual goes on to lie even further when it refers to a letter to
the Queen of England. Her Majesty the Queen indeed had been
contacted, although not over parking tickets, that is simply a lie by
a coward. The issue brought to the attention of Her Majesty related
to our parliamentary democracy and the fact that the
Governor-General, David Johnston had overstepped the boundaries of
his responsibilities and authority. In return Buckingham Palace
responded on two separate occasions proving that the hundreds of
millions of taxpayer dollars are in fact wasted on ancient ties to
the Monarchy.
As
far as parking tickets go which 'shim' Eubanks refers to, that is
another issue all together. In Canada we have this belief that our
laws are equally applicable to all Canadians. An absolute and
alarming falsehood, especially when corruption at government levels
take a hand, as it had in St. Catharines.
One
individual by the name of John Reiter decided that the law did not
apply to him, and that he could do as he pleased. John Reiter works
for Metro Freightliner, he drove a white Ford van often with a
trailer attached for his ride-on mowers and other equipment. He was
also a personal friend of Sheila Morra and her husband Tony Morra.
At the time Sheila Morra was a City of St. Catharines Councillor and
lived opposite John Reiter on Glendale Avenue.
Parking tickets are a slap on the wrist to those who decide to park
illegally. Most drivers obey the law although there are times when
one is in a hurry or simply cannot find a parking vacancy and so a
driver decides to take a risk. John Reiter decided that the law did
not apply to him at all. Reiter had no care for the safety of
innocent people at all. As the intersection at Almond and Glendale
is not a safe one he decided to park his vehicles illegally almost
every day for several years, with over 500 photographs taken. City
staff were contacted, the mayor's office was contacted, the Parking
Authority too were contacted, the Niagara Regional Police and
Councillor Jennie Stevens also were contacted. No
one did anything to enforce the law, in the case of Councillor
Jennie Stevens who came and looked at the photos and then left and
never to be heard of again, only questions remain. Hundreds of
photographs spanning several years of intentional abuse of the law
and not one single parking infringement written! Corruption at the
City offices on Church Street is the only answer.
The
truth matters little to a 'shim' like Bob Eubanks who hides behind a
false name. He was joined by another 'shim' who went by a tag called
'city dweller'. This individual decided to identify where the
complainant actually lives. In the end cowardice is a human trait
seen throughout history, and presents no surprise when exhibited by
the likes of Bob Eubanks or city dweller. Instead a true affront to
dignity comes from The Standard and those associated with it.
Reporters
Marlene Bergsma and Jeff Bolichowski are not strangers to deceit and
misconception. Peter Conradi as a City Editor in 2006 at The
Standard doctored photographs to suit a story rather than the
truth, now he is Editor-In-Chief. Censorship takes a new twist at
the hands of those who claim to present the news at The Standard.
Finally
columnist Doug Herod presents his opinion on September 13th
2013 titled, 'Code of conduct fine... until complaint received.' Doug
Herod at The Standard
often thinks he is clever or funny, this time he tries to stay a
little more on the serious side. He says that he thought a Code of
Conduct was a waste of time and that “there were already
a number of existing ways to keep municipal politicians in check.”
Doug Herod naturally does not mention in what ways we can keep those
politicians “in check.” There is enough hard evidence that
proves corruption, whether the fact that one individual was protected
from the consequence of the law for several years, or the fixing of a
lawful by-law fine by the mayor and city councillor. He may look at
the fact that the mayor admitted to a breach of the Criminal Code
without consequence, or the fact that city officials knowingly
permitted a business to break the law for over five years and then
attempt to cover it up. Maybe Doug Herod would have the courage to
examine the facts of the deceit by the city councillor who is to be
investigated. Though facts would not be something columnist Doug
Herod of The Standard would
entertain.
A
frightening reality exists in Canada and the people have not been
allowed to awaken to it. Those who elect the representatives of
government have no rights once the elected take office. In a
democracy that has to be frightening. Now councillors like Joe
Kushner want to change the Code of Conduct, and that is no surprise.
In the end, when censorship and deceit emanates from the media,
corruption is enabled to take stronger roots.
Send comments to: demtruth@gmail.com
As a new reader of mayorgate I just want to ask one question.
ReplyDeleteSince slimy Bob Eubanks is outing the complainant are we to assume this sad excuse for a human is an political insider?
Could this over-zealous sad-sack be one of the administration's insiders, a councillor, a bureaucrat, a staffer, or maybe even the mayor himself?
What kind of civic leaders do we have in Niagara? Whatever they are they sure don’t have much to brag about.
Something drives this persistent coward to such great lengths to malign anyone who is fighting for the taxpayer.
The Standard newspaper allows this type of malicious vindictiveness but for what reason?
They can block the IP address but refuse. Why?
They can out this cowards identity but they prefer to protect this activity. Why?
Is the standard in bed with the administration?