This
is not an easy question to answer. Freedom without any boundaries
would only result in anarchy. Laws, legislation and rules are needed
to guide society on a path which will sustain equality for all. Yet
administering the varying rules is not an easy task and impartial
adjudication an absolute necessity. Still for some reason society
decides that watchdog bodies are most often comprised of those the
watchdog is needed over.
Professional
watchdogs administer an array of rules of conduct or codes within
their own profession. Doctors diagnose issues over doctors, lawyers
cross examine lawyers, police investigate police, and so on. Are
these groups really impartial? In whose best interest do they really
serve? After all the Criminal Code is not placed in the hands of
those who break the law, to equally and fairly determine what
consequences should be applied or when.
So
although a cynic may find little faith in the reality of these
professional watchdogs and their claims of adhering to a code, one
group seems to be beyond reach of even the pseudo watchdog. Our
elected members of government appear to often skirt away ethics and
integrity with little to no consequence for their actions.
Our
Ontario Ombudsman has no authority over Provincial Members of
Parliament nor does he have any over municipal government. In fact
as an example of a truly impartial body, he has no greater authority
other than to release moral recommendations, regardless of the
professional body he investigates. The Parliamentary Legislative
Integrity Commissioner will not entertain complaints from the public,
and the Auditor General equally impotent. In the end what are we
really left with?
In
St. Catharines, Ontario an elected City Councillor has intentionally
misled fellow council members and the public. The City of St.
Catharines has a published Code of Conduct for Elected Officials
available on the web. This 'code' makes it clear that a written
complaint outlining the alleged breach, if considered by the City to
be a breach, will be passed on to an Integrity Commissioner or the
Office of the Ontario Ombudsman for investigation. Mind you it is
the City, no one specifically is named, who decides if the complaint
really is worth investigating.
The
ludicrous insanity does not stop at the front door. If the complaint
indeed passes such impartial decision making it then is brought to
Council who decide whether an Integrity Commissioner is selected or
the Ombudsman to do the investigation. As this is government the
time lapse period between the day when the written complaint is
provided to the City Clerk to this mid-point is anyone's guess.
Sadly it is not like a pizza delivery, 30 minutes or it's free.
Once
it is in the hands of the investigator a blanket of total secrecy is
dropped over the whole process. Upon completion of the investigation
any recommendations and decisions are provided to Council. Now it is
the City Council that decides whether or not the recommendations are
actually to be applied. Council has 90 days to make this decision.
There is nothing in the 15 page document made publicly available by
the City of St. Catharines that outlines possible penalties, if any,
if the investigation indeed proves the allegations to be real.
A
test case had been prepared and delivered to the City Clerk for the
City of St. Catharines. The written complaint details the breaches
of 'the code' by Councillor Jeff Burch. In this case Councillor
Burch had willfully and intentionally mislead fellow members of
council and the public. The notion of public interest was discarded
by Councillor Jeff Burch, laws and policies stained beyond
recognition by dishonesty. City of St. Catharines established its
Code of Conduct for the claimed purpose that it “enhances public
trust.” Now it is the
opportunity for the City to prove their claim.
This
'code' by the City of St. Catharines appears to be set up in a
fashion where it basically guarantees that nothing will eventuate
even if an investigation is carried out and the alleged offences
proven. Its formula designed in such a manner that it is up to City
Council to decide if any recommendations by an Integrity Commissioner
or Ombudsman are even accepted or acted on. Councillor Jeff Burch's
own fellow councillors would decide if any action will be taken
against him!
In
this specific case, each of the City of St. Catharines Councillors
were fully aware of the facts and that lawyer John Willey, on behalf
of his client Sam Demita, owner and operator of Sun Collision, had lied to them. Each of the members of council were aware of the
official government documentation made available to them prior to the
public meeting. When Councillor Jeff Burch stood upon to publicly
present his deception, each of his fellow councillors knew that Burch was being dishonest before them. Can this be Councillor Jeff Burch's
defense then? After all if his fellow councillors knew that he was
being publicly dishonest and misleading, then he could not be
misleading them. Was he, Jeff Burch, only intending to mislead the
public then and not council?
Can
this be a cynic's observation or simply a frightening truth? There
are a number of these official bodies that administer a flood of various 'codes'. The Law Society of Upper Canada adheres to the
mantra 'in the best interest of his or her client,' which
is not always in the best interest of the law. Ontario's Press
Council will tell one that a newspaper has the right to choose what
to print, yet censorship is exactly that. Try and climb that wall of
semantics. Doctors are governed by the College of Physicians and
Surgeons, only as in the case of Dr. Valerie Jaeger of Niagara, the
College stated that she was a public official and the rules governing
her as a doctor didn't apply, even though she was a practising family
physician at the same time.
So
where will this request for an investigation of Councillor Jeff Burch
go? The evidence proving that Councillor Burch had been dishonest
and intentionally misleading of fellow councillors and the public is
clear. Jeff Burch cannot claim that he was serving “the
public interest by upholding both the letter and the spirit of the
laws and policies established by the Ontario Legislature, and St.
Catharines City Council.”
Here
is an opportunity for a government in Canada to prove that a 'code'
was meant for something more than breaking. Yet in the end it is up
to Councillor Jeff Burch's fellow council members to decide if
anything is done, even if an investigation is carried out. Can such
a situation provide public confidence or enhance public trust in our
elected officials?
Democracy
is served well when the people are provided the information and facts
openly. When the right to question any situation is made available,
then equality thrives. Corruption in Laval, Quebec or of the Senate
by Senators was made public by the media to ensure that further
corrupt acts were not possible, and the truth was open. In St.
Catharines both The Standard and Niagara this Week have
proven that censorship of fact is their chosen road. In the end
censorship and deceit become the breeding grounds for corruption.
In
the final analysis little is expected as a result of this filed
request for investigation of Councillor Jeff Burch under the Code of
Conduct. As head of council Mayor Brian McMullan was present on
April 29th,
2013, and was fully aware of Councillor Burch's intentional deceit.
Now it will be up to council to decide how far this will be taken.
Is
democracy's only measuring stick the right to choose where we put our
mark on a ballot paper? Can we as the people who had chosen our
representatives in government be satisfied or silent as they breach
ethics, dignity and honesty, and then decide themselves if they face
any consequences? Only public outcry can bring forth a weapon strong
enough to ensure the protection of equality in our society. The
elected fear only the glare of publicity as a mythical vampire fears
the sun's light.
The
test case is now in play, and as patients waiting in a hospital
emergency room we will have to wait for the results.
Send comments to: demtruth@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment