Gardening
is both art and simple pleasure, and as gardeners we can choose to be
inspired by others, or remain free spirited, willing to experiment
and make mistakes. Regardless of the path we choose for ourselves,
no garden can become a garden without a plan of some sort. Now the
real fun, as Martha Stewart might say, really begins, making choices.
As
children we are introduced to a method of dealing with questions with
multiple choice answers. Unlike the examiner in school, our gardens
are far more forgiving. If a plant was chosen and planted in a
location where the sun's smiling face is too strong for the poor
thing to handle, then simply bring out the shovel or pitchfork and
move it. The wrong choice does not represent itself as a failing
grade, it simply requires another choice to be made.
In 1997 my wife Olivera, our two children and I came to this modest home
in St. Catharines, Ontario. Its yard not large though barren of any
colour, simply grass stretching from front to back. Two large maple
trees flanked left and right in the front of the house, and nothing
more. Olivera had spent most of her life growing up as an apartment
dweller and had not got her hands into 'dirt' before. Her father had
spent many years as a custodian of an apartment complex, looking
after the grounds, though young Olivera had not joined in at that
time. Now she was eager to try anything, and without gardening
gloves.
This was the original blank canvas we had landed upon. The only question was what to do next? |
My
background was somewhat different, as a child of eight or nine my
parents had installed me as their apprentice gardening hand. Colour
always filled our front yard with a variety of plantings, and the
back was a veritable supermarket vegetable section with tomatoes,
dill cucumbers, zucchini and so much more. Nothing was considered
out of place and style did not exist, only the splendour of life. So
I was introduced to soil under my fingernails and brown patches on my
jean's knees early, and have remained so inclined ever since.
Here
and now we were forced with the cliched 'blank canvas'. We knew that
it could not remain so, the rest was going to be a journey of making
choices, changing them, and then refining our space to suit our
dreams and ground them in reality. Our 'blank canvas' measured only
33 feet in width and a little over 100 feet in depth, reality could
not be ignored.
Average
suburbia gardens represented a small amount of lawn cut away next to
the house. Here rudimentary shrubs, such as evergreen balls, may be
planted with a little occasional colour splashed in between. Plastic
hanging baskets with geraniums left swinging through mid-Spring and
Summer. The remaining space is left green and exposed to either a
weekly or bi-weekly ballet to the accompaniment of a two-stroke mower
engine.
Backyards
are generally kept as green carpets exposed to the same musical fate
as the front. Some install pools, either in-ground or dropped atop,
though in the Niagara area of Ontario pools do not represent the same
oasis quality as their counter parts in California or Florida. Our
climate in Niagara becomes a serious spoiler for optimum usefulness
of these receptacles of chlorinated water.
So
a pool was definitely out of the question for us. Our backyard was
after all only 33 feet wide and 100 feet deep not allowing for great
expression, at least those were our thoughts at the beginning. The
decision process was somewhat difficult, knowing more of what we
didn't want rather than what we did want to replace it. Seeing
inspiration from those who had travelled the path of such decision
making is not simply copying someone's success. It is more like a
pinch of bone meal in the soil to encourage and stimulate germination
of growth and the illumination of colour.
One
of England's greats, Gertrude Jekyll, born in London in 1843, is an
example of both formality and picturesque playfulness of a
traditional English garden. Gertrude Jekyll had authored 15 books
about gardening, her most famous being Colour in the Flower
Garden, and had collaborated
with Sir Edwin Lutyens, another famous English garden designer. Many
gardens, regardless of their chosen style, display a Lutyens Bench as
an accessory of privilege, even if it is a copy.
Gertrude
Jekyll, not only a prolific author of gardening books, had worked on
famous gardens such as Greywalls, Hestercombe and Upton Grey.
Hestercombe Gardens stand as an example of regal formality. Hedges
trimmed perfectly, lawns manicured, and not a hair out of place. At
Upton Grey, Gertrude Jekyll allowed herself to play with colour and a
brash informality. It is a planned and organized 'mess', yet when in
bloom bringing forth a smile on all who visit.
Europe's
gardens of the Baroque or Renaissance period with their geometric
designs, coupled with topiaries standing as sentries, still find
themselves copied in part today. Though without giving consideration
to the actual surroundings of a garden one could take on a task of
the ridiculous. Our front yard is in polite terminology modest, in
reality small. Topiaries, whether in animal shapes or geometric in
design, would appear mildly insane. Two mature maple trees flanked
left and right, their roots made the surface uneven, more conducive
to grazing a sheep for the purpose of lawn care rather than a man
made device.
Olivera
took to books, gardening magazines, and gardening programs on HGTV.
My inclination was more on the side of a wonderful English gardener
and his famous call to all gardeners. Christopher Lloyd dared all
gardeners to “do something outlandish, to splash out, and
be freer than ever.”
Christopher
Lloyd was born in 1921 and passed away in 2006. He was the twentieth
century's most influential gardener, author of numerous books, and
'steward' at Great Dixter. The rose garden at Great Dixter was
designed by Edwin Lutyens in 1912, it had ten geometric beds, each
planted with the Hybrid Teas. This rose garden had yew hedges on
three sides and an ancient cow house on the last, providing shelter
from winter's harsh conditions. Christopher Lloyd decided to replace
the Lutyen designed rose garden with something more daring, even
shocking.
English
gardeners are not to be expected to fall into neat categories for
labelling, and Christopher Lloyd proved that more than once. In
1994 the old roses were ripped out and Christopher Lloyd recorded,
“The rending noise of huge old roots reminded me of a
hyena devouring a plank of wood” (from the Preface by Frank Ronan
of Exotic Planting for Adventurous Gardeners). Lloyd
had decided to be daring even shocking to a degree.
Frank
Ronan said of Christopher Lloyd, “...I know that shock
was not his intention. He might have enjoyed the overreaction of
others, but that was never what he set out to achieve. Who would go
to the enormous trouble of making an exotic garden only to see dismay
on the faces of people you thought little of anyway? No, he made
that garden out of an absolute love of the plants and the desire to
grow them. If there had been no one else to look at it, or be
shocked, he would have done it all the same.”
If
inspiration was to be sort out then this would be mine. It is the
sheer beauty and serenity of a garden that provides the motivation.
As far as shock value went, we did indeed achieve that later, though
in the beginning we started slowly. Our garden's major constraint
was its size, or lack of size, at least it appeared so in the early
stages. Till finally we picked up our pruners and released ourselves
from the set perceptions of a suburban front yard, or that of a
'small' space.
Looking
at our space, both my wife and I knew that it could not remain as it
was. Yet this did not mean we could simply take a shovel and begin
to dig, not without some plan or idea to follow, to guide us.
Neither of us had any formal training in horticulture or garden
design. It was to become the beginning of a journey learning through
experience, and most of all the willingness to try almost anything.
In time it has led us to the garden we have today, and a question
that has never found an answer with finality. What's next?
The blank canvas has changed dramatically, and we did truly 'splash out'. |
This
is the first instalment of a six part series which will follow the
journey of a garden as it evolved and changed to become an oasis of
silent splendour. Both my wife and I changed gradually with our
garden, becoming more daring, slowly cutting loose the bounds of
convention. Come and enjoy the ride, and bring with you your
comments and experiences, after all as gardeners we love to share,
and not only our seeds.
Send comments to: demtruth@gmail.com
Most of the front yards I visit are either too plain (foundation plantings pushed up against the house or a riot of different colours textures and shapes. I try to accentuate the architecture both in period and style.
ReplyDeleteGarden evolved over time this way.So when designing a garden there is a wide latitude.Simple is best for a front yard. Visually you can't take in all the nuances of many plantings. Colour simplified is your best bet if you want a lot of variety.Lipstick on a pig is still a pig. Sorry bad reference. What I am saying is anything goes but just not everything.