What
motivated Interim Federal Liberal Party Leader Bob Rae, his shadow
Aboriginal Affairs critic Carolyn Bennett to become what now seems
co-conspirators with Chief Spence. The Federal NDP representative
Charlie Angus has his guitar strapped on his back singing the woes of
Attawapiskat, as if he was a minstrel of days gone past, for some
time. For some degree on the surface it was understandable as
Attawapiskat is within the boundaries of Charlie Angus's riding and
he is part of the official opposition party. But what can explain
the apparent intentional deceit that the opposition became a part of.
Chief
Theresa Spence had not only deceived all of Canada but the whole
world with her act. Her deception was clear and intentional, her
motivation still under question. Undeniable evidence had been
examined and published in two articles on Mayorgate which proves
massive premeditated misappropriation of public money at the
Attawapiskat Reserve. Chief Spence and her supporters had labelled
the Deloitte audit conducted on behalf of the federal government as a
smear campaign to discredit Chief Spence. The fact is that Chief
Theresa Spence had no credibility whatsoever, not as a chief nor as a
pretending activist who claimed she was willing to die for her
people. Chief Spence is a fraud who has many questions to answer and
who has run from those questions constantly. It is on the evidence
provided that such a comment is made.
There
is much conjecture on what motivated Chief Theresa Spence to play out
her spectacle of a so-called hunger strike for the world to gaze
upon. A greater question now rests why some of the elected
representatives of our government became willing accomplices to the
fraud. Chief Spence could not of found such public attention without
the manipulation of media. Still it was not enough, not without the
very public rantings of opposition politicians in front of reporters
and even through social media.
Opposition
politics within a democratic government presents a balance to the
government with debate and even objection to actions planned for
implementation. After all when an election is held and there is more
than one party listed on the ballot sheet there must be a runner-up
in the end. When on the other hand the government controls both the
Upper and Lower Houses of Parliament the opposition can do very
little but make noise. Nothing is really off limits; scandal,
accusation even personal attacks are merely a politician's weapons. Still
as elected Members of Parliament a certain code of ethics must be
demanded. It would be impossible to claim that Charlie Angus, Bob
Rae and Carolyn Bennett are stupid or completely ignorant. Equally
to believe that either one of these experienced politicians is naive
or physically impaired of vision is difficult to accept. So what can
explain their motivation for what now clearly appears to be
intentional deceit of the Canadian people?
Chief
Theresa Spence was facing a more than embarrassing situation
regarding the finances of the Attawapiskat First Nations Reserve.
Tens of millions of dollars are missing with no real explanation or
documentation. In addition to her concerns about the audit Chief
Theresa Spence was fully aware of tens of millions of dollars that
were claimed in annual financial statements by the Attawapiskat Band
were nothing more than fraud, theft of public money. The
Attawapiskat Reserve is governed by a small select few who control
the money, its intentional misappropriation and the greater majority
suffer. Spence and her handlers decided to present Canada a horror
scenario to weaken the hearts of the masses.
Canada
became the victim of a planned manipulation with images of derelict
houses and innocent people living in horrific conditions. Media was
happy to play along with such images and stories on the evening news.
Chief Spence a softly spoken woman would be a less likely target for
the sensitive Canadian media as the CTV interview was to prove later.
Amnesty
International issued their public statement on Aboriginal Communities
December 8th 2011, Chief Spence did her round of public
appearances for the media and the state of emergency was declared by
Spence October 28th 2011. On December 17th
2011 Bob Rae with Carolyn Bennett in tow arrived at Attawapiskat for
his personal tour. This visit was filmed for the record and upon his
departure Bob Rae said that what he saw was Canada's third world.
Bob Rae said “these
are our fellow citizens...” was
Rae and Bennett wilfully and intentionally blind to the truth, or did
the truth simply not matter?
Bob
Rae although only an interim leader still a leader of a massive and
powerful political machine. This machine has the experienced
manpower to research, examine and even to question documentation.
Can Rae claim ignorance to the Financial Statements filed by the
Attawapiskat First Nation and many of which carry the signature of
Theresa Spence? Even though Amnesty International issued the self
righteous statement and Chief Spence passed around the photographs
demanding more and more surely the facts did not change.
Attawapiskat has a population of less than 2000 and its own declared
financial statements simply did not add up. Bob Rae, Carolyn Bennett
and Charlie Angus did not seem to care for the facts.
In
his filmed interview Bob Rae spoke of the horrendous conditions he
witnessed at Attawapiskat. Now the question remains what did he
really see? Did Bob Rae or Carolyn Bennett visit the homes of Chief
Theresa Spence or any of the homes of the 'privileged' families of
Attawapiskat? An email recently received from Keven Libin of the
National Post stated that reporter Jonathon Day debunked the idea
that the “greater majority live in horrendous conditions,” and
Kevin Libin went on to say “In fact he (Johnathon Kay) found that
contrary to some earlier reports manipulated, I suspect by the
administration by Spence herself – most people on the reserve live
in fairly decent existences, with only a minority (he estimated 5%)
living in those widely publicized hovels (not surprisingly, the band
authority would not allow him to take any photographs, perhaps
worried it would compromise their media campaign).”
If
only an estimated 5% of the population in Attawapiskat live in the
highly publicized hovels as stated by the National Post then this
raises serious questions regarding Bob Rae, Carolyn Bennett and their
claims. Bob Rae's highly publicized visit was December 17th
2011. What did Bob Rae really see? Why would he misrepresent the
truth to the people of Canada? Why had Bob Rae continued to
represent Chief Theresa Spence as a hero of the First Nations people
when he had access to the financial statements and evidence of
apparent fraud in Attawapiskat of public money on such a huge scale?
Charlie
Angus presented his statement in the House of Commons on November
20th
2012 on First Nations Financial Transparency Act. His words were
full of emotion and passion laying the blame on the federal
government. Angus said, “The Conservatives talk about
bands posting numbers. We are talking about budgets of hundreds of
millions of dollars that have no accountability mechanisms to the
people who should be receiving that accountability: the
communities.” How did
Charlie Angus hold a straight sanctimonious face making this
presentation. Does being in opposition permit deceit?
Charlie
Angus has seen the real truth in Attawapiskat just as Bob Rae. Angus
has seen the financial statements posted on behalf of the
Attawapiskat First Nations and he has sung the public song of Chief
Theresa Spence. “Talk about posting numbers,” numbers were
posted by the Attawapiskat band and those numbers were a fraud. Does
Charlie Angus have an explanation for the band's numbers for 2010,
where wages and employee benefits expenditure was posted as
$9,810,586 with only 39 employees listed whose salaries totalled a
mere $980,391 leaving an unexplained $8,830,195 missing? In 2008
there is a missing $9,273,629 and no documentation is posted for 2011
or 2009 relating to the listed recipients of wages and benefits.
In
February 2012 Charlie Angus was in Attawapiskat as the first of 22
new modular homes purchased by the federal government arrived. Angus
was making loud noises about the cost of site preparation, he told
Postmedia News: “A lot of work has to be done on the ground
level, but the band has to front all the money, and all their money
is sitting in a desk in Winnipeg.” (Natalie Stechyson Postmedia
News Feb.14.2012, Modular homes arrive in Attawapiskat, but remain
empty due to delays). Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan
said that the government had the necessary funds made available for
the site preparation work. Still this was not enough Angus was
quoted “Make sure everything is done then tally up the numbers
at the end of it. It's not rocket science.” (Postmedia News).
There
was a great deal of truth in those words that Angus threw around, it
truly is not rocket science. Attawapiskat had at their disposal over
ten million dollars sitting in a trust account and not “in a desk
in Winnipeg.” That seemed not to matter to MP Charlie Angus. As
far as the notion to “tally up the numbers at the end of it,”
that was done annually in the Attawapiskat Consolidated Financial
Statements and those numbers do not make sense. Not exactly rocket
science just apparent fraud. None of this seemed to matter to MP
Charlie Angus.
What
is enough for Attawapiskat? The millions of dollars that DeBeers
Victor Mine has paid does not seem to be. Reports of a blockade of a
road leading into the mine February 5th 2013 by residents
of Attawapiskat demanding more, proves that. Cry loud enough about
housing, have the media carry your song and the federal government
buys new homes and even foots the bill for their set-up. Still that
is not enough in Attawapiskat. More than $50 million is unaccounted
for in two listed expenditures over four years from 2008 to 2011
alone! Millions of dollars have gone up in a puff of smoke with no
police investigation and no questions asked. This apparently is not
a problem to Bob Rae or Charlie Angus after all it's opposition
politics.
Bob
Rae decided to take the deceit and farce of Chief Spence together
with the IDLE NO MORE movement to a new level with the unveiling of
the Declaration of Commitment. Rae's political experience is
extensive there is no denying that fact so asking the question as to
the real value of that document one does so only with a grin.
The
Declaration of Commitment has thirteen points listed but it is
number eight which provides some shock to its absurdity. It states:
“Ensure that all federal legislation has the free, prior and
informed consent of First Nations where inherent and Treaty rights
are affected or impacted.”
In
essence this point in the declaration demands that the Government of
Canada surrender its law making authority to a third party. What
government anywhere in the world would surrender its authority or
sovereignty? Can the architect
of this declaration, Bob Rae explain the motivation behind such a
demand. Would Rae if ever there was a possibility to be the Prime
Minister agree to this? Don't the people of Canada have any voice in
this very serious demand?
It
is difficult to understand the purpose of the Declaration
of Commitment as a
document. The issues surrounding the First Nations are sensitive and
complex requiring consultation, cooperation and action. This
cooperation must be equal between the First Nations and Canada's
Federal Government, in the end it has to benefit the whole country or
it will not work. Demands for Crown involvement are simply without
sense and only convolute the situation, as the Crown has no legal
authority in any legislative discussions. Still point one of the
Declaration continues to demand the Crown's involvement.
The
final point, number thirteen demands full implementation of the
United Nations
Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – UNDRIP. Amnesty
International proved how valuable an outside international body
really can be. Together with the Canadian Friends Service Committee
– rooted in the Quaker faith and KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical
Justice Initiatives – which unites eleven churches and religious
organizations, Amnesty issued their statement December 8th
2011, regarding Attawapiskat. Amnesty's statement said “According
to media reports..,” what
did Amnesty see for themselves or did they simply use newspaper
clippings? If any of these self-righteous groups actually visited
Attawapiskat the question remains, what did Chief Theresa Spence let
them see?
Still
that was not enough for KAIROS and its group of religious followers.
On January 10th
2013 a statement issued in support of Chief Spence stated, “While
the audit does show that some paperwork is lacking, this does not
prove fraud or waste.” Leaving
the much criticized Deloitte audit aside and reexamining
Attawapiskat's own financial statements fraud is the only answer.
Bob Rae knew that, as did Charlie Angus yet they preferred to look
the other way, why? The real question to be asked now.
Opposition politics in Canada had
taken a dangerous slide down the slope away from any semblance of
ethics. Bob Rae knew the truth behind Attawapiskat yet he was
willing to fling about terms like “third world” for the media.
Those in Attawapiskat who had suffered had done so at the hands of
Chief Theresa Spence, the Band's Council and Band Manager. Is it
possible for Bob Rae to claim he knew nothing of the facts
surrounding the issues of fraud and misappropriation of funds. How
can Charlie Angus explain to the people of Canada that Chief Theresa
Spence had at her disposal a trust account valued at over ten million
dollars yet all she did was blame the federal government for the woes
of a few of her own. In fact Chief Theresa Spence had possibly
committed the biggest fraud against Canada in our history, with the
full support of opposition politics.
During the 'hunger' strike, while
visiting hotels Chief Theresa Spence had a bank account opened in her
name administered by her common-law partner Clayton Kennedy. Did Bob
Rae or the Liberal Party, or Charlie Angus and the NDP provide any
donations to Chief Spence's private account? It is time to demand
full disclosure of the bank account and bank records of transactions.
Fear of offending First Nations
people by demanding the truth is only a tool perpetuated to shelter
Chief Theresa Spence from facing the consequences of her actions.
Bob Rae and Charlie Angus had taken opposition politics in Canada
down to a new level of disgust and each has serious questions to
answer. In the end it is our nation that pays the price and it is we
the people of Canada who have the right to demand the truth.
Interim Federal Liberal Party leader Bob Rae was contacted by email, providing an opportunity for Mr. Rae to present his comments. There has been no response to date. |
Send comments to: demtruth@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment